These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25316493)

  • 21. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study.
    Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating class III malocclusions.
    Gencer D; Kaygisiz E; Yüksel S; Tortop T
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 24913739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial.
    Lione R; Balboni A; Di Fazio V; Pavoni C; Cozza P
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):441. PubMed ID: 36217134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
    Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
    Kaya B; Arman A; Uçkan S; Yazici AC
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Mossaz CF; Byloff FK; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):616-23. PubMed ID: 18005835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mechanism of Class II correction in prepubertal and postpubertal patients with Twin Force Bite Corrector.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Uribe F; Nanda R
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):718-27. PubMed ID: 23194014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Masucci C; Vangelisti A; Defraia E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22748993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cephalometric changes in growing patients with increased vertical dimension treated with cervical headgear.
    Sambataro S; Fastuca R; Oppermann NJ; Lorusso P; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Caprioglio A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Jul; 78(4):312-320. PubMed ID: 28455746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in hyperdivergent patients.
    Lineberger MW; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Herberger T; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 22748991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effectiveness of twin blocks and extraoral maxillary splint (Thurow) appliances for the correction of Class II relationships.
    Fernandes ÁF; Brunharo IH; Quintão CC; Costa MG; de Oliveira-Costa MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 20877731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predictive value of molar bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment outcomes.
    Antonarakis GS; Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 21411476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rapid palatal expansion in mixed dentition using a modified expander: a cephalometric investigation.
    Cozza P; Giancotti A; Petrosino A
    J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 28(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11395527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dento-skeletal effects of the Pendulum Hygienic Distalizer.
    Ba-Yazed AH; Hafez AM; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):21-5. PubMed ID: 25745706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.