231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25316494)
1. Tooth angulation and dental arch perimeter-the effect of orthodontic bracket prescription.
Pontes LF; Cecim RL; Machado SM; Normando D
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 25316494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of Preadjusted Bracket Shape and Positioning Reference on Angulation of Upper Central Incisor.
Topolski F; de O Accorsi MA; Trevisi HJ; Cuoghi OA; Moresca R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Oct; 17(10):786-790. PubMed ID: 27794146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning.
Cho MY; Choi JH; Lee SP; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A three-dimensional comparison of torque achieved with a preadjusted edgewise appliance using a Roth or MBT prescription.
Mittal M; Thiruvenkatachari B; Sandler PJ; Benson PE
Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):292-7. PubMed ID: 24978676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Labio-lingual root control of lower anterior teeth and canines obtained by active and passive self-ligating brackets.
Cattaneo PM; Salih RA; Melsen B
Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 23249256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.
Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choosing a pre-adjusted orthodontic appliance prescription for anterior teeth.
Thickett E; Taylor NG; Hodge T
J Orthod; 2007 Jun; 34(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 17545296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A segmented appliance for space closure followed by Invisalign and fixed appliances.
Uribe F; Cutrera A; Nanda R
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 22299111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of crown inclination and angulation after orthodontic treatment using digital models : Comparison to the prescription of the brackets used.
Castro IO; Frazão Gribel B; Alencar AHG; Valladares-Neto J; Estrela C
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jul; 79(4):227-234. PubMed ID: 29644390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign.
Kravitz ND; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Obrez A; Agran B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 19121497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Employing Tip-Edge brackets on canines to simplify straight-wire mechanics.
Rocke RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 7942648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Torque differences according to tooth morphology and bracket placement: a finite element study.
Papageorgiou SN; Sifakakis I; Keilig L; Patcas R; Affolter S; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):411-418. PubMed ID: 27932407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth in 3-dimensional space in patients with near-normal occlusion.
Tong H; Kwon D; Shi J; Sakai N; Enciso R; Sameshima GT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):604-17. PubMed ID: 22554755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of a newly designed twin-slot bracket on severely malpositioned teeth--a typodont experimental study.
Shen G; Chen RJ; Hu Z; Qian YF
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 18678759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of crown-root angulation of lateral incisors adjacent to palatally impacted canines.
Kanavakis G; Curran KM; Wiseman KC; Barone NP; Finkelman MD; Srinivasan S; Lee MB; Trotman CA
Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():4. PubMed ID: 25749110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental crowding in primary dentition and its relationship to arch and crown dimensions among preschool children of Davangere.
Prabhakar AR; Ravi GR; Kurthukoti AJ; Shubha AB
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 18647513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
