BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25316663)

  • 1. Comparative Analysis of Various Aspects of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius COM.TEC Cell Separator Instruments.
    Philip J; Biswas AK; Chatterjee T; Mallhi RS
    Lab Med; 2014; 45(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 25316663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC, and Trima Accel Cell separators.
    Keklik M; Eser B; Kaynar L; Sivgin S; Keklik E; Solmaz M; Ozturk A; Buyukoglan R; Yay M; Cetin M; Unal A
    J Clin Apher; 2015 Jun; 30(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 25230340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of double dose plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus, Fresenius COM.TEC and Trima Accel cell separators.
    Keklik M; Eser B; Kaynar L; Solmaz M; Ozturk A; Yay M; Birekul A; Oztekin M; Sivgin S; Cetin M; Unal A
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2014 Oct; 51(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 25219639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Plateletpheresis on the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec Cell Separators.
    Altuntas F; Sari I; Kocyigit I; Kaynar L; Hacioglu S; Ozturk A; Oztekin M; Solmaz M; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
    Transfus Med Hemother; 2008; 35(5):368-373. PubMed ID: 21512626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Type of Cell Separator, Fenwal Amicus vs Fresenius Com Tec, May Influence the Corpuscular Elements Value of the Donor`s Blood.
    Landzo E; Aganovic-Musinovic I; Bevanda D; Bogut A; Bevanda M; Bevanda Glibo D; Pravdić D
    Psychiatr Danub; 2019 Dec; 31(Suppl 5):821-825. PubMed ID: 32160178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the Fenwal Amicus and Fresenius Com.Tec cell separators for autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection.
    Altuntas F; Kocyigit I; Ozturk A; Kaynar L; Sari I; Oztekin M; Solmaz M; Eser B; Cetin M; Unal A
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2007 Apr; 36(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 17369096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The influence of initial values of donor platelets count on the efficiency of plateletpheresis with the cell separator Fenval Baxter Amicus s.v.2.51].
    Landzo E; Berbić-Fazlagić J; Sofo-Hafizović A
    Med Arh; 2009; 63(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 19537658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of donor factors contributing to plateletpheresis yields among apheresis platelet donors.
    Woodall WJ; Nguyen VQ; Tran MH
    J Clin Apher; 2014 Jun; 29(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 24222645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First comparative evaluation of a new leukapheresis technology in non-cytokine-stimulated donors.
    Steininger PA; Strasser EF; Weiss D; Achenbach S; Zimmermann R; Eckstein R
    Vox Sang; 2014 Apr; 106(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24152115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of Fenwal Amicus blood cell separator in double dose platelet collection.
    Gürak S; Arslan O
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2007 Feb; 36(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 17270496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Platelet collection with the Amicus and the AS.TEC 204 blood cell separators.
    Moog R; Müller N; Goergens D
    Transfusion; 1998 Mar; 38(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 9563409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency of adverse events in plateletpheresis donors in regional transfusion centre in North India.
    Patidar GK; Sharma RR; Marwaha N
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2013 Oct; 49(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 23830186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Amicus Separator in the collection of apheresis platelets.
    Yockey C; Murphy S; Eggers L; Garratty G; Dingle A; Helms C; Moroff G
    Transfusion; 1998 Sep; 38(9):848-54. PubMed ID: 9738625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Severe CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia is not observed in frequent plateletpheresis donors collected on the Fenwal Amicus.
    Gansner JM; Papari M; Goldstein J; Gaufberg RA; Neuberg D; Makar RS; Kaufman RM
    Transfusion; 2019 Sep; 59(9):2783-2787. PubMed ID: 31271458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of plateletpheresis on the Fresenius AS.TEC 204 and Haemonetics MCS 3p.
    Ranganathan S
    J Clin Apher; 2007 Feb; 22(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17111420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plateletpheresis concentrates produced with the COMTEC cell separator: the French experience.
    Coffe C; Benguella M; Domy M; Cottier D; Guignier F; N'gondara JP; Carrère A; Masse M; Naegelen C; Biggio B; Tiberghien P; Hervè P; Bouzgarrou R; Maurel JP; Vezon G; Vidal M; Quainon F; Benamara A; Lamy B; Beaumont JL; Bierling P; Gondrexon G; Schooneman F; Janot C; Villard F; Huart JJ
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2001 Aug; 25(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 11791767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a new apheresis system for the collection of leukoreduced single-donor platelets.
    Zingsem J; Strasser E; Ringwald J; Zimmermann R; Weisbach V; Eckstein R
    Transfusion; 2007 Jun; 47(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 17524087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving technology for collecting platelets by apheresis: five-year experience in one blood center.
    Vassallo RR; Wahab F; Giordano K; Murphy S
    Transfus Med Rev; 2004 Oct; 18(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 15497126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of automated plateletpheresis using five different apheresis systems in a tertiary care hospital.
    Chaudhary R; Das SS; Khetan D; Ojha S; Verma S
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2009 Apr; 40(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 19237317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paired crossover study of two plateletpheresis systems concerning platelet product quality and donor comfort.
    Flesch BK; Adamzik I; Steppat D; Miller J; Carstensen L; Schapke M; Davey J
    Transfusion; 2010 Apr; 50(4):894-901. PubMed ID: 19951314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.