These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25318002)

  • 1. Image analysis software versus direct anthropometry for breast measurements.
    Quieregatto PR; Hochman B; Furtado F; Machado AF; Sabino Neto M; Ferreira LM
    Acta Cir Bras; 2014 Oct; 29(10):688-95. PubMed ID: 25318002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. JPEG and raw image files compared to direct measurement of the breast region.
    Quieregatto PR; Sabino Neto M; Furtado F; Quieregatto ADA; Trigo Junior TW; Ferreira LM
    Acta Cir Bras; 2020; 35(10):e202001008. PubMed ID: 33263608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photographs for anthropometric measurements of the breast region. Are there limitations?
    Quieregatto PR; Hochman B; Furtado F; Ferrara SF; Machado AF; Sabino Neto M; Ferreira LM
    Acta Cir Bras; 2015 Jul; 30(7):509-16. PubMed ID: 26270144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anthropometry of the breast region: how to measure?
    Quieregatto PR; Hochman B; Ferrara SF; Furtado F; Liebano RE; Sabino Neto M; Ferreira LM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2014 Apr; 38(2):344-9. PubMed ID: 24610111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of anthropometry with photogrammetry based on a standardized clinical photographic technique using a cephalostat and chair.
    Han K; Kwon HJ; Choi TH; Kim JH; Son D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):96-107. PubMed ID: 19482483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A New Tool for Breast Anthropometric Measurements: Presentation and Validation for Women and Men.
    Mikołajczyk M; Kasielska-Trojan A; Antoszewski B
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(5):1160-1170. PubMed ID: 31372741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: evaluation of anthropometric precision and accuracy using a Genex 3D camera system.
    Weinberg SM; Scott NM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Marazita ML
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2004 Sep; 41(5):507-18. PubMed ID: 15352857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial motor function monitored by hand held calipers versus computer-assisted photography.
    Clapham L; Bottoms S; Mehta R; Davis A
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Dec; 148(12):1281-7; discussion 1287. PubMed ID: 17091210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incidence of lower eyelid asymmetry: an anthropometric analysis of 204 patients.
    Bravo FG; Kufeke M; Pascual D
    Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Aug; 33(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 23825308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3-D breast anthropometry of plus-sized women in South Africa.
    Pandarum R; Yu W; Hunter L
    Ergonomics; 2011 Sep; 54(9):866-75. PubMed ID: 21846287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A method of assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application.
    Brown TP; Ringrose C; Hyland RE; Cole AA; Brotherston TM
    Br J Plast Surg; 1999 Jul; 52(5):355-9. PubMed ID: 10618977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Breast Anthropometry: Values and Application in Breast Surgery for Vietnamese Women.
    Le QH; Nguyen HC
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Feb; 23(2):665-671. PubMed ID: 35225480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computerized photogrammetry used to calculate the brow position index.
    Naif-de-Andrade NT; Hochman B; Naif-de-Andrade CZ; Ferreira LM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 36(5):1047-51. PubMed ID: 22936380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New aspects in digital breast assessment: further refinement of a method for automated digital anthropometry.
    Hartmann R; Weiherer M; Schiltz D; Baringer M; Noisser V; Hösl V; Eigenberger A; Seitz S; Palm C; Prantl L; Brébant V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Mar; 303(3):721-728. PubMed ID: 33184690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validating Paediatric Morphometrics: body proportion measurement using photogrammetric anthropometry.
    Penders B; Brecheisen R; Gerver A; van Zonneveld G; Gerver WJ
    J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2015 Nov; 28(11-12):1357-62. PubMed ID: 26226127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Photoanthropometry of the Face in the Young White Brazilian Population.
    Gonzales PS; Machado CEP; Michel-Crosato E
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(6):619-623. PubMed ID: 30517486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Geometrical verification system using Adobe Photoshop in radiotherapy.
    Ishiyama H; Suzuki K; Niino K; Hosoya T; Hayakawa K
    Radiat Med; 2005 Feb; 23(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 15786757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bra band size measurements derived from three-dimensional scans are not accurate in women with large, ptotic breasts.
    McGhee DE; Ramsay LG; Coltman CE; Gho SA; Steele JR
    Ergonomics; 2018 Mar; 61(3):464-472. PubMed ID: 28673203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The 3dMD photogrammetric photo system in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: Validation of interexaminer variations and perceptions.
    Nord F; Ferjencik R; Seifert B; Lanzer M; Gander T; Matthews F; Rücker M; Lübbers HT
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1798-803. PubMed ID: 26421470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional facial anthropometry of unilateral cleft lip infants with a structured light scanning system.
    Li G; Wei J; Wang X; Wu G; Ma D; Wang B; Liu Y; Feng X
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Aug; 66(8):1109-16. PubMed ID: 23664802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.