519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25319077)
1. Head to head: The role of academic competition in undergraduate anatomical education.
Van Nuland SE; Roach VA; Wilson TD; Belliveau DJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 25319077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing student engagement and self-regulated learning in a medical gross anatomy course.
Pizzimenti MA; Axelson RD
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 24845421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors influencing student performance on the carpal bone test as a preliminary evaluation of anatomical knowledge retention.
Meyer AJ; Armson A; Losco CD; Losco B; Walker BF
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 24838440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.
Huitt TW; Killins A; Brooks WS
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24799448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When students struggle with gross anatomy and histology: A strategy for monitoring, reviewing, and promoting student academic success in an integrated preclinical medical curriculum.
Hortsch M; Mangrulkar RS
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):478-83. PubMed ID: 25641923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory.
Traser CJ; Hoffman LA; Seifert MF; Wilson AB
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 25288343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Students helping students: Evaluating a pilot program of peer teaching for an undergraduate course in human anatomy.
Bruno PA; Love Green JK; Illerbrun SL; Holness DA; Illerbrun SJ; Haus KA; Poirier SM; Sveinson KL
Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 26060978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A little healthy competition: using mixed methods to pilot a team-based digital game for boosting medical student engagement with anatomy and histology content.
Janssen A; Shaw T; Goodyear P; Kerfoot BP; Bryce D
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():173. PubMed ID: 26459198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lecture recording system in anatomy: possible benefit to auditory learners.
Bacro TR; Gebregziabher M; Ariail J
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(6):376-84. PubMed ID: 23508921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Student performance in and perceptions of a high structure undergraduate human anatomy course.
Shaffer JF
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):516-528. PubMed ID: 26990231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of selected "desirable difficulties" on the ability to recall anatomy information.
Dobson JL; Linderholm T
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 25227209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does learning in clinical context in anatomical sciences improve examination results, learning motivation, or learning orientation?
Böckers A; Mayer C; Böckers TM
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23733503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio.
Durán CE; Bahena EN; Rodríguez Mde L; Baca GJ; Uresti AS; Elizondo-Omaña RE; López SG
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 22383124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Student perceptions of an upper-level, undergraduate human anatomy laboratory course without cadavers.
Wright SJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):146-57. PubMed ID: 22362500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of Three-Dimensional Printed Anatomical Models on First-Year Student Engagement in a Block Mode Delivery.
Tripodi N; Kelly K; Husaric M; Wospil R; Fleischmann M; Johnston S; Harkin K
Anat Sci Educ; 2020 Nov; 13(6):769-777. PubMed ID: 32163665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality.
Meyer AJ; Innes SI; Stomski NJ; Armson AJ
Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 25981194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Participation in asynchronous online discussion forums does improve student learning of gross anatomy.
Green RA; Farchione D; Hughes DL; Chan SP
Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 23733524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of neurosurgical and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging tractography in clinically integrated neuroanatomy modules: a cross-sectional study.
Familiari G; Relucenti M; Heyn R; Baldini R; D'Andrea G; Familiari P; Bozzao A; Raco A
Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(5):294-306. PubMed ID: 23509097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
