These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25319243)

  • 1. Exposures of Sus scrofa to a TASER(®) conducted electrical weapon: no effects on 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis patterns of plasma proteins.
    Jauchem JR; Cerna CZ; Lim TY; Seaman RL
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2014 Dec; 10(4):526-34. PubMed ID: 25319243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of a TASER® conducted energy weapon on the circulating red-blood-cell population and other factors in Sus scrofa.
    Jauchem JR; Bernhard JA; Cerna CZ; Lim TY; Seaman RL; Tarango M
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):308-20. PubMed ID: 23543463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blood lactate concentration after exposure to conducted energy weapons (including TASER® devices): is it clinically relevant?
    Jauchem JR
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):386-94. PubMed ID: 23605975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER(®) devices) to Sus scrofa.
    Jauchem JR
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S229-33. PubMed ID: 21198623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased Hematocrit Due to Electrical-Waveform Exposures in Splenectomized Sus scrofa.
    Jauchem JR; Burns JM; Voorhees WB; Jirjis MB
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jul; 64(4):1196-1202. PubMed ID: 30508303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 40-Hz square-wave stimulation requires less energy to produce muscle contraction: compared with the TASER® X26 conducted energy weapon.
    Comeaux JA; Jauchem JR; Cox DD; Crane CC; D'Andrea JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23682682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physiological effects of the TASER C2 conducted energy weapon.
    Jauchem JR; Seaman RL; Klages CM
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2009; 5(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 19598011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of three conducted electrical weapons in a surrogate swine cardiac safety model.
    Dawes DM; Ho JD; Halperin HR; Fink SJ; Driver BE; Klein LR
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2021 Jan; 77():102088. PubMed ID: 33242742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons and two probe designs using a swine comparative cardiac safety model.
    Dawes DM; Ho JD; Moore JC; Miner JR
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 23543462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Police shootings after electrical weapon seizure: homicide or suicide-by-cop.
    Kroll MW; Ross DL; Brave MA; Williams HE
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Nov; 135(6):2547-2554. PubMed ID: 34318353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exposures to conducted electrical weapons (including TASER® devices): how many and for how long are acceptable?
    Jauchem JR
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S116-29. PubMed ID: 25443856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of continuous application of the TASER X26 waveform on Sus scrofa.
    Jenkins DM; Murray WB; Kennett MJ; Hughes EL; Werner JR
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 May; 58(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 23489132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infection Risk From Conducted Electrical Weapon Probes: What Do We Know?
    Kroll MW; Ritter MB; Guilbault RA; Panescu D
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Nov; 61(6):1556-1562. PubMed ID: 27429421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrical weapons and rhabdomyolysis.
    Kroll MW; Witte KK; Ritter MB; Kunz SN; Luceri RM; Criscione JC
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Mar; 17(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 32946064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrical weapons, hematocytes, and ischemic cardiovascular accidents.
    Kroll MW; Witte KK; Kunz SN; Luceri RM; Criscione JC
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Jul; 73():101990. PubMed ID: 32658748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival of anesthetized Sus scrofa after cycling (7-second on/3-second off) exposures to an electronic control device for 3 minutes.
    Jauchem JR; Seaman RL; Fines DA
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Jun; 32(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 21464698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Commentary on: Jauchem J. Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER devices) to Sus scrofa. J Forensic Sci 2011;56 (S1): S229-33.
    Dawes DM; Ho JD; Miner JR
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):1078. PubMed ID: 21729085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task.
    Ho J; Dawes DM; Kunz SN; Satpathy R; Klein L; Driver B; Stang JL
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Dec; 16(4):613-621. PubMed ID: 32812174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conducted electrical weapons or stun guns: a review of 46 cases examined in casualty.
    Becour B
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2013 Jun; 34(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 23574872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New conducted electrical weapons: Electrical safety relative to relevant standards.
    Panescu D; Nerheim M; Kroll MW; Brave MA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2185-2190. PubMed ID: 29060330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.