These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25319563)

  • 1. Three-dimensional biplanar radiography as a new means of accessing femoral version: a comparitive study of EOS three-dimensional radiography versus computed tomography.
    Pomerantz ML; Glaser D; Doan J; Kumar S; Edmonds EW
    Skeletal Radiol; 2015 Feb; 44(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 25319563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Femoral and tibial torsion measurement in children and adolescents: comparison of 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiography and low-dose CT.
    Rosskopf AB; Ramseier LE; Sutter R; Pfirrmann CW; Buck FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W285-91. PubMed ID: 24555627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system.
    Schlatterer B; Suedhoff I; Bonnet X; Catonne Y; Maestro M; Skalli W
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 19251231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validating the use of 3D biplanar radiography versus CT when measuring femoral anteversion after total hip arthroplasty : a comparative study.
    Anderson CG; Brilliant ZR; Jang SJ; Sokrab R; Mayman DJ; Vigdorchik JM; Sculco PK; Jerabek SA
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Nov; 104-B(11):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 36317354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.
    Glaser DA; Doan J; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1391-7. PubMed ID: 22415001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Femoral version: Comparison among advanced imaging methods.
    Fuller CB; Farnsworth CL; Bomar JD; Jeffords ME; Murphy JS; Edmonds EW; Pennock AT; Wenger DR; Upasani VV
    J Orthop Res; 2018 May; 36(5):1536-1542. PubMed ID: 29077224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?
    Atkins PR; Shin Y; Agrawal P; Elhabian SY; Whitaker RT; Weiss JA; Aoki SK; Peters CL; Anderson AE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan; 477(1):242-253. PubMed ID: 30179924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Axial oblique CT to assess femoral anteversion.
    Jarrett DY; Oliveira AM; Zou KH; Snyder BD; Kleinman PK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):1230-3. PubMed ID: 20410408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of a new method for lower-extremity measurements based on stereoradiographic three-dimensional reconstruction.
    Guenoun B; Zadegan F; Aim F; Hannouche D; Nizard R
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Sep; 98(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 22858107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of Low-dose Biplanar Radiography in Assessing Pediatric Torsional Pathology.
    Brooks JT; Bomar JD; Jeffords ME; Farnsworth CL; Pennock AT; Upasani VV
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2021 Jan; 41(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 33055518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Simple Method for Measurement of Femoral Anteversion-Validation and Assessment of Reproducibility.
    Brunner A; Eichinger M; Hengg C; Hoermann R; Brenner E; Kralinger F
    J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Aug; 30(8):e273-8. PubMed ID: 27031264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and interobserver reliability and agreement in three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of component positions after total knee arthroplasty.
    Yoshino K; Hagiwara S; Nakamura J; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Ohtori S
    Knee; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1102-1110. PubMed ID: 31340892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying the tibiofemoral joint space using x-ray tomosynthesis.
    Kalinosky B; Sabol JM; Piacsek K; Heckel B; Gilat Schmidt T
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6672-82. PubMed ID: 22149849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional computed tomography for determination of femoral anteversion in a cerebral palsy model.
    Riccio AI; Carney CD; Hammel LC; Stanley M; Cassidy J; Davids JR
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2015 Mar; 35(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 25668788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and Reliability of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With True Anatomic Femoral Version.
    Beebe MJ; Wylie JD; Bodine BG; Kapron AL; Maak TG; Mei-Dan O; Aoki SK
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2017 Jun; 37(4):e265-e270. PubMed ID: 28244927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional measurement of femoral neck anteversion and neck shaft angle.
    Sangeux M; Pascoe J; Graham HK; Ramanauskas F; Cain T
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 25354092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated computation of femoral angles in dogs from three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions: Comparison with manual techniques.
    Longo F; Nicetto T; Banzato T; Savio G; Drigo M; Meneghello R; Concheri G; Isola M
    Vet J; 2018 Feb; 232():6-12. PubMed ID: 29428094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of rib cage parameters from 3-Dimensional reconstruction images obtained using simultaneous biplanar radiographic scanning technique in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Comparison with conventional computed tomography.
    Machino M; Kawakami N; Ohara T; Saito T; Tauchi R; Imagama S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2020 May; 75():94-98. PubMed ID: 32178993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of a new method for evaluating femoral stem positioning after total hip arthroplasty based on stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction.
    Guenoun B; El Hajj F; Biau D; Anract P; Courpied JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jan; 30(1):141-4. PubMed ID: 25161165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring femoral and rotational alignment: EOS system versus computed tomography.
    Folinais D; Thelen P; Delin C; Radier C; Catonne Y; Lazennec JY
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 99(5):509-16. PubMed ID: 23877073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.