These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 253196)

  • 21. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care.
    Khuri SF; Daley J; Henderson W; Barbour G; Lowry P; Irvin G; Gibbs J; Grover F; Hammermeister K; Stremple JF
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 May; 180(5):519-31. PubMed ID: 7749526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A quality improvement management model for renal care.
    Vlchek DL; Day LM
    Nephrol News Issues; 1991 Apr; 5(4 Suppl P):3-12; discussion 12-4. PubMed ID: 1801798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dietetic audit--a giant step for nutritional care. The approach at Brooke Army Medical Center.
    El-Beheri BB
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1979 Mar; 74(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 762357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measuring differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.
    Richards T; Lurie N; Rogers WH; Brook RH
    Med Care; 1988 May; 26(5 Suppl):S1-141. PubMed ID: 3131602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Managing perceptions of hospital quality. Negative emotional evaluations can undermine even the best clinical quality.
    Zifko-Baliga GM; Krampf RF
    Mark Health Serv; 1997; 17(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 10169030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing the validity of national quality measures for coronary artery disease using an electronic health record.
    Persell SD; Wright JM; Thompson JA; Kmetik KS; Baker DW
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Nov; 166(20):2272-7. PubMed ID: 17101947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A 10-year review of quality improvement monitoring in pain management: recommendations for standardized outcome measures.
    Gordon DB; Pellino TA; Miaskowski C; McNeill JA; Paice JA; Laferriere D; Bookbinder M
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2002 Dec; 3(4):116-30. PubMed ID: 12454804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Goal and outcome in social work practice.
    Rock BD
    Soc Work; 1987; 32(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 10283657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using data to evaluate performance.
    DesHarnais S; Chesney J; Wroblewski R; Fleming ST
    Mich Hosp; 1987 Oct; 23(10):21-3, 25-6. PubMed ID: 10284649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selecting, developing, and evaluating indicators.
    Angaran DM
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1991 Sep; 48(9):1931-7. PubMed ID: 1928135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quality assurance and data collection: current status, problems, and pitfalls.
    Caldwell FS
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Aug; 60(8):35-8. PubMed ID: 10313282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Outcome measurement: concepts and questions.
    Lohr KN
    Inquiry; 1988; 25(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 2966125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of social work practice in health care settings.
    Peterson KJ; Anderson SC
    Soc Work Health Care; 1984; 10(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 6515518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validating audit criteria: an analytic approach illustrated by peptic ulcer disease.
    Dershewitz RA; Gross RA; Williamson JW
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1979 Oct; 5(10):18-25. PubMed ID: 121383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Criteria mapping: using logic in evaluation of processes of care.
    Kaplan SH; Greenfield S
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Jan; 4(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 103031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cottage industry to postindustrial care--the revolution in health care delivery.
    Swensen SJ; Meyer GS; Nelson EC; Hunt GC; Pryor DB; Weissberg JI; Kaplan GS; Daley J; Yates GR; Chassin MR; James BC; Berwick DM
    N Engl J Med; 2010 Feb; 362(5):e12. PubMed ID: 20089956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measure for measure: new insights offered and challenges encountered in the efforts to improve acute stroke care: comment on "Processes of care associated with acute stroke outcomes".
    Schwamm LH
    Arch Intern Med; 2010 May; 170(9):810-2. PubMed ID: 20458089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Two approaches to measuring quality in medical case management programs.
    Collard AF; Bergman A; Henderson M
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1990 Jan; 16(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2107488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inferior design: how an audit on surgery for breast masses was hampered by poor study design.
    Buckingham WB
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Jan; 4(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 103027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How to evaluate health promotion.
    Green LW
    Hospitals; 1979 Oct; 53(19):106-8. PubMed ID: 112025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.