These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25319736)

  • 1. The Relationship Between Colonoscopy Procedure Order and Adenoma Detection Rates: A Prospective Study.
    Kang HY; Kim D; Kim HJ; Kang SJ; Chung GE; Song JH; Yang SY; Kim YS; Park MJ; Yim JY; Lim SH; Kim JS
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 49(8):683-9. PubMed ID: 25319736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by the timing of colonoscopy when performed in half-day blocks.
    Gurudu SR; Ratuapli SK; Leighton JA; Heigh RI; Crowell MD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Aug; 106(8):1466-71. PubMed ID: 21502998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
    DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position.
    Lurix E; Hernandez AV; Thoma M; Castro F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Apr; 75(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 22321696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Does endoscopist fatigue play a role in incomplete colonoscopies and detection of polypoid lesions?].
    Borda F; Borda A; Jiménez FJ; Fernández-Urién I; Vila JJ; Zozaya JM
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 24342118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colonoscopy scheduling influences adenoma and polyp detection rates.
    Paeck KH; Heo WJ; Park DI; Kim YH; Lee SH; Lee CK; Eun CS; Han DS
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2013 Oct; 60(127):1647-52. PubMed ID: 24634936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy.
    Bhangu A; Bowley DM; Horner R; Baranowski E; Raman S; Karandikar S
    Br J Surg; 2012 Oct; 99(10):1436-44. PubMed ID: 22961527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "Running late" and adenoma detection - is there an association?
    Condiotte AM; Robertson DJ; Blodgett C; MacKenzie TA; Pohl H
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 25412091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
    Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies.
    Leffler DA; Kheraj R; Bhansali A; Yamanaka H; Neeman N; Sheth S; Sawhney M; Lamont JT; Aronson MD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):554-60. PubMed ID: 22341102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors Associated with Surveillance Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates.
    Maratt JK; Dickens J; Schoenfeld PS; Elta GH; Jackson K; Rizk D; Erickson C; Menees SB
    Dig Dis Sci; 2017 Dec; 62(12):3579-3585. PubMed ID: 29043592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trainee participation and adenoma detection rates during screening colonoscopies.
    Chalifoux SL; Rao DS; Wani SB; Sharma P; Bansal A; Gupta N; Rastogi A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 48(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 24440932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.
    Sarvepalli S; Garber A; Rothberg MB; Mankaney G; McMichael J; Morris-Stiff G; Vargo JJ; Rizk MK; Burke CA
    JAMA Surg; 2019 Jul; 154(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 30994911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polyp Sizing Poster Improves Polyp Measurement but not Adenoma Detection Rates by Endoscopists in a Large Community Practice.
    Shaukat A; Shamsi N; Menk J; Church TR; Rank J; Colton JB
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2034-2041. PubMed ID: 30312788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
    Cavicchi M; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Cattan P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Karsenti D
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 31471862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
    Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
    Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Right-sided adenoma detection with retroflexion versus forward-view colonoscopy.
    Chandran S; Parker F; Vaughan R; Mitchell B; Fanning S; Brown G; Yu J; Efthymiou M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):608-13. PubMed ID: 25440687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists.
    Lee JY; Koh M; Lee JH
    Dig Dis Sci; 2021 Aug; 66(8):2756-2762. PubMed ID: 32808142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient- and procedure-related factors affecting proximal and distal detection rates for polyps and adenomas: results from 1603 screening colonoscopies.
    Schramm C; Mbaya N; Franklin J; Demir M; Kuetting F; Toex U; Goeser T; Steffen HM
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Dec; 30(12):1715-22. PubMed ID: 26272199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.