BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25319939)

  • 1. Dental arch changes from 22 to 43 years of age: are they different in individuals with high versus low mandibular plane angle?
    Bondevik O; Espeland L; Stenvik A
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25319939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Thirty-two-year follow-up study of Herbst therapy: a biometric dental cast analysis.
    Pancherz H; Bjerklin K; Lindskog-Stokland B; Hansen K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 24373651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Progressive changes in arch width from primary to early mixed dentition period: a longitudinal study.
    Sangwan S; Chawla HS; Goyal A; Gauba K; Mohanty U
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2011; 29(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 21521912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 40 years follow-up of dental arch dimensions and incisor irregularity in adults.
    Tsiopas N; Nilner M; Bondemark L; Bjerklin K
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Apr; 35(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 22015823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental arch width, overbite, and overjet in a Finnish population with normal occlusion between the ages of 7 and 32 years.
    Heikinheimo K; Nyström M; Heikinheimo T; Pirttiniemi P; Pirinen S
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Aug; 34(4):418-26. PubMed ID: 21357654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in dental arch measurements of young adults with normal occlusion--a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Miguel JA
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):618-23. PubMed ID: 15529495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults.
    Forster CM; Sunga E; Chung CH
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 18263889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.
    Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Makou M; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19959610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spacing in deciduous dentition of Polish children in relation to tooth size and dental arch dimensions.
    Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Stepien P; Syrynska M
    Arch Oral Biol; 2009 May; 54(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 19251244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Curve of Spee and its relationship to vertical eruption of teeth among different malocclusion groups.
    Veli I; Ozturk MA; Uysal T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Mar; 147(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 25726397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occlusal changes in orthodontically treated subjects 40 years after treatment and comparison with untreated control subjects.
    Freitas KMS; Massaro C; Miranda F; de Freitas MR; Janson G; Garib D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Nov; 160(5):671-685. PubMed ID: 34493418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal evaluation of dental arch asymmetry in Class II subdivision malocclusion with 3-dimensional digital models.
    Veli I; Yuksel B; Uysal T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):763-70. PubMed ID: 24880847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model analysis in "8020" achievers using three-dimensional images.
    Nomura M; Kano M; Motegi E; Fuma A; Mizuno H; Okano S; Sueishi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2013; 54(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 24521548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between rapid and mixed maxillary expansion through an assessment of arch changes on dental casts.
    Grassia V; d'Apuzzo F; Jamilian A; Femiano F; Favero L; Perillo L
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():20. PubMed ID: 26122076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploration of variations in positions of upper and Lower incisors, overjet, overbite, and irregularity Index in orthodontic patients with dissimilar depths of Curve of spee.
    Kumari N; Fida M; Shaikh A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2016; 28(4):766-772. PubMed ID: 28586579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of dental arch measurements in the primary dentition between contemporary and historic samples.
    Warren JJ; Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 11244414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison study between three tooth positioners.
    Mischler WA; Delivanis HP
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 6594055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions.
    Lux CJ; Conradt C; Burden D; Komposch G
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):674-85. PubMed ID: 14719732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relapse revisited--again.
    Dyer KC; Vaden JL; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 22858332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tooth size and dental arch dimensions: a stereophotogrammetric study in Southeast Asian Malays.
    Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Anderson PJ; Townsend GC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 22008304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.