161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25319974)
1. Is intraoperative frozen section analysis of reexcision specimens of value in preventing reoperation in breast-conserving therapy?
Jorns JM; Daignault S; Sabel MS; Wu AJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Nov; 142(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 25319974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frozen sections in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery at a single ambulatory surgical center: 5 year experience.
Jorns JM; Daignault S; Sabel MS; Myers JL; Wu AJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1273-1281. PubMed ID: 28215733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative frozen section analysis of margins in breast conserving surgery significantly decreases reoperative rates: one-year experience at an ambulatory surgical center.
Jorns JM; Visscher D; Sabel M; Breslin T; Healy P; Daignaut S; Myers JL; Wu AJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Nov; 138(5):657-69. PubMed ID: 23086766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance.
Camp ER; McAuliffe PF; Gilroy JS; Morris CG; Lind DS; Mendenhall NP; Copeland EM
J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16310688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.
Osako T; Nishimura R; Nishiyama Y; Okumura Y; Tashima R; Nakano M; Fujisue M; Toyozumi Y; Arima N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2015 Dec; 20(6):1093-101. PubMed ID: 25855313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of frozen-section analysis of sentinel lymph node and lumpectomy margin status on reoperation rates in patients undergoing breast-conservation therapy.
McLaughlin SA; Ochoa-Frongia LM; Patil SM; Cody HS; Sclafani LM
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jan; 206(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 18155571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes of breast-conserving surgery in patients using a modified method for cavity margin assessment.
Chen K; Zeng Y; Jia H; Jia W; Yang H; Rao N; Song E; Cox CE; Su F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(11):3386-94. PubMed ID: 22488098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions.
Sauter ER; Hoffman JP; Ottery FD; Kowalyshyn MJ; Litwin S; Eisenberg BL
Cancer; 1994 May; 73(10):2607-12. PubMed ID: 8174059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Defining the clinical target volume for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pathologic analysis.
Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):722-30. PubMed ID: 15465188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with close or focally involved margins following breast-conserving surgery: treatment with reexcision or radiotherapy with increased dosage.
Monteau A; Sigal-Zafrani B; Kirova YM; Fourchotte V; Bollet MA; Vincent-Salomon A; Asselain B; Salmon RJ; Fourquet A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(4):1021-8. PubMed ID: 19386441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of margin status and reexcision in local recurrence following breast conservation surgery.
Adams BJ; Zoon CK; Stevenson C; Chitnavis P; Wolfe L; Bear HD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):2250-5. PubMed ID: 23686015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical outcomes of an intraoperative surgical margin assessment using the fresh frozen section method in patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery - a single center analysis.
Nowikiewicz T; Śrutek E; Głowacka-Mrotek I; Tarkowska M; Żyromska A; Zegarski W
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13441. PubMed ID: 31530867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of analysis of frozen-section margin on reoperation rates in women undergoing lumpectomy for breast cancer: evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.
Boughey JC; Hieken TJ; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Grant CS; Farley DR; Thomsen KM; Osborn JB; Keeney GL; Habermann EB
Surgery; 2014 Jul; 156(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 24929768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.
Weber S; Storm FK; Stitt J; Mahvi DM
Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 9327150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of resection margins in patients treated with breast conservation surgery.
Zavagno G; Goldin E; Mencarelli R; Capitanio G; Del Bianco P; Marconato R; Mocellin S; Marconato G; Belardinelli V; Marcon F; Nitti D
Cancer; 2008 May; 112(9):1923-31. PubMed ID: 18327818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of routine frozen-section analysis of breast margins compared with reoperation for positive margins.
Osborn JB; Keeney GL; Jakub JW; Degnim AC; Boughey JC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3204-9. PubMed ID: 21861234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
Wood WC
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]