204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25320345)
1. Fructose- and glucose-conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition.
Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2014 Dec; 307(12):R1448-57. PubMed ID: 25320345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
Kraft TT; Huang D; Lolier M; Warshaw D; LaMagna S; Natanova E; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():64-9. PubMed ID: 26485292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs.
Zukerman S; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2013 Oct; 305(7):R840-53. PubMed ID: 23926132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Pinhas A; Aviel M; Koen M; Gurgov S; Acosta V; Israel M; Kakuriev L; Guskova E; Fuzailov I; Touzani K; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 21945373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study.
Zukerman S; Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2013 Jan; 109():33-41. PubMed ID: 23200639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential fructose and glucose appetition in DBA/2, 129P3 and C57BL/6 × 129P3 hybrid mice revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
Nashed M; Castillo A; Roland M; Carata I; Berglas E; Pines R; Riaz S; Morisset BJ; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2021 Nov; 241():113590. PubMed ID: 34509472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ghrelin signaling is not essential for sugar or fat conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Sclafani A; Touzani K; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2015 Oct; 149():14-22. PubMed ID: 26003495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2012 Jun; 106(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 22445944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Operant licking for intragastric sugar infusions: Differential reinforcing actions of glucose, sucrose and fructose in mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():115-24. PubMed ID: 26485294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.
Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
Chem Senses; 2015 May; 40(4):245-58. PubMed ID: 25715333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():23-31. PubMed ID: 25484359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2014 Jun; 133():92-8. PubMed ID: 24811140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid acquisition of conditioned flavor preferences in rats.
Ackroff K; Dym C; Yiin YM; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2009 Jun; 97(3-4):406-13. PubMed ID: 19303888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conditioned preference and avoidance induced in mice by the rare sugars isomaltulose and allulose.
Sclafani A; Castillo A; Carata I; Pines R; Berglas E; Joseph S; Sarker J; Nashed M; Roland M; Arzayus S; Williams N; Glendinning JI; Bodnar RJ
Physiol Behav; 2023 Aug; 267():114221. PubMed ID: 37146897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Post-oral fat stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: A concentration-response study.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Physiol Behav; 2014 Apr; 129():64-72. PubMed ID: 24582671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.
Sclafani A; Ackroff K
Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():156-63. PubMed ID: 25497884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.
Sclafani A; Vural AS; Ackroff K
Chem Senses; 2017 Mar; 42(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 28158517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration.
Ackroff K; Sclafani A
Appetite; 2004 Jun; 42(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 15183920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
Sclafani A; Glass DS; Margolskee RF; Glendinning JI
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2010 Dec; 299(6):R1643-50. PubMed ID: 20926763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
