BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25320531)

  • 1. Stratified computed tomography findings improve diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis.
    Park G; Lee SC; Choi BJ; Kim SJ
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(38):13942-9. PubMed ID: 25320531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiation of early perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: MDCT findings, MDCT diagnostic performance, and clinical outcome.
    Kim MS; Park HW; Park JY; Park HJ; Lee SY; Hong HP; Kwag HJ; Kwon HJ
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 24633221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT.
    Choi D; Park H; Lee YR; Kook SH; Kim SK; Kwag HJ; Chung EC
    Acta Radiol; 2003 Nov; 44(6):574-82. PubMed ID: 14616200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Independent predictors of acute appendicitis on CT with pathologic correlation.
    Ives EP; Sung S; McCue P; Durrani H; Halpern EJ
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):996-1003. PubMed ID: 18620120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective study of 24 cases of acute appendiceal diverticulitis: CT findings and pathological correlations.
    Yardimci AH; Bektas CT; Pasaoglu E; Kinaci E; Ozer C; Sevinc MM; Mahmutoglu AS; Kilickesmez O
    Jpn J Radiol; 2017 May; 35(5):225-232. PubMed ID: 28247217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity and specificity of the individual CT signs of appendicitis: experience with 200 helical appendiceal CT examinations.
    Rao PM; Rhea JT; Novelline RA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 9294553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reassessment of CT images to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis and an equivocal preoperative CT interpretation.
    Kim HC; Yang DM; Kim SW; Park SJ
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1178-85. PubMed ID: 22193372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The prevalence and patterns of intraluminal air in acute appendicitis at CT.
    Cabarrus M; Sun YL; Courtier JL; Stengel JW; Coakley FV; Webb EM
    Emerg Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 22996072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis.
    Wijetunga R; Tan BS; Rouse JC; Bigg-Wither GW; Doust BD
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):747-53. PubMed ID: 11719671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraluminal air within an obstructed appendix: a CT sign of perforated or necrotic appendicitis.
    Azok JT; Kim DH; Munoz Del Rio A; Sonavane SK; Bhalla S; Anaya-Baez V; Menias CO
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):1175-80. PubMed ID: 22818790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pitfalls and mimickers at 64-section helical CT that cause negative appendectomy: an analysis from 1057 appendectomies.
    Soyer P; Dohan A; Eveno C; Naneix AL; Pocard M; Pautrat K; Hamzi L; Duteil C; Lavergne-Slove A; Boudiaf M
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(5):895-901. PubMed ID: 23845254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic prediction of complicated appendicitis by combined clinical and radiological appendicitis severity index (APSI).
    Avanesov M; Wiese NJ; Karul M; Guerreiro H; Keller S; Busch P; Jacobsen F; Adam G; Yamamura J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3601-3610. PubMed ID: 29541911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Added value of ultrasound re-evaluation for patients with equivocal CT findings of acute appendicitis: a preliminary study.
    Sim JY; Kim HJ; Yeon JW; Suh BS; Kim KH; Ha YR; Paik SY
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1882-90. PubMed ID: 23392792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis.
    Weyant MJ; Eachempati SR; Maluccio MA; Rivadeneira DE; Grobmyer SR; Hydo LJ; Barie PS
    Surgery; 2000 Aug; 128(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 10922984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis with CT.
    Yeung KW; Chang MS; Hsiao CP
    Clin Imaging; 2004; 28(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 15531143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of CT characteristics in the diagnosis of Schistosoma japonicum associated appendicitis with clinical and pathological correlation: a diagnostic accuracy study.
    Valluru B; Zhou Z; Sah D; Du W; Ali MO; Adam AA; Zhang L; Wang JJ
    Jpn J Radiol; 2020 Feb; 38(2):178-191. PubMed ID: 31823157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of CT in decision for acute appendicitis treatment.
    Kus CC; Ilgın C; Yeğen C; Demirbas BT; Tuney D
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2022 Nov; 28(6):540-546. PubMed ID: 36550753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid to diagnose appendicitis with a 64-detector row CT scanner.
    Moteki T; Ohya N; Horikoshi H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 22082540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT predictors of failed laparoscopic appendectomy.
    Siewert B; Raptopoulos V; Liu SI; Hodin RA; Davis RB; Rosen MP
    Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 14595145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT diagnosis of mucocele of the appendix in patients with acute appendicitis.
    Bennett GL; Tanpitukpongse TP; Macari M; Cho KC; Babb JS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Mar; 192(3):W103-10. PubMed ID: 19234237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.