These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25321715)

  • 1. Monotone spline regression for accurate MTF measurement at low frequencies.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ren L; Li Z; Ghani MU; Liu H
    Opt Express; 2014 Sep; 22(19):22446-55. PubMed ID: 25321715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Techniques to improve the accuracy of presampling MTF measurement in digital X-ray imaging based on constrained spline regression.
    Zhou Z; Zhu Q; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ma W; Gao F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Apr; 61(4):1339-49. PubMed ID: 24658257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An effective method to verify line and point spread functions measured in computed tomography.
    Ohkubo M; Wada S; Matsumoto T; Nishizawa K
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2757-64. PubMed ID: 16964851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the accuracy of MTF measurement at low frequencies based on oversampled edge spread function deconvolution.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L; Ren L; Li Z; Ghani MU; Hao T; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(4):517-29. PubMed ID: 26410662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normalization of the modulation transfer function: the open-field approach.
    Friedman SN; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2008 Oct; 35(10):4443-9. PubMed ID: 18975691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
    Carton AK; Vandenbroucke D; Struye L; Maidment AD; Kao YH; Albert M; Bosmans H; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1684-95. PubMed ID: 16013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function.
    Samei E; Ranger NT; Dobbins JT; Chen Y
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1454-65. PubMed ID: 16752580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems.
    Samei E; Buhr E; Granfors P; Vandenbroucke D; Wang X
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3613-25. PubMed ID: 16030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ; Reimann DA
    Med Phys; 1998 Jan; 25(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 9472832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 1999 Jan; 26(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9949395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image.
    Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2323-31. PubMed ID: 14528954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditioning data for calculation of the modulation transfer function.
    Maidment AD; Albert M
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 12607842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of the line-pair bar-pattern method in the measurement of the modulation transfer function (MTF) in megavoltage imaging.
    Gopal A; Samant SS
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 18293582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signal and noise in modulation transfer function determinations using the slit, wire, and edge techniques.
    Cunningham IA; Reid BK
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1037-44. PubMed ID: 1518465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality dependence on in-plane positions and directions for MDCT images.
    Hara T; Ichikawa K; Sanada S; Ida Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 19410407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed tomography commissioning programmes: how to obtain a reliable MTF with an automatic approach?
    Miéville F; Beaumont S; Torfeh T; Gudinchet F; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):443-8. PubMed ID: 20167797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A method of measuring presampled modulation transfer function using a rationalized approximation of geometrical edge slope].
    Honda M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Apr; 70(4):346-58. PubMed ID: 24759215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of the modulation transfer function of digital X-ray detectors with an opaque edge-test device.
    Illers H; Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15933111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [XRII image distortion correction for C-arm-based surgical navigation system].
    Yan S; Qian L
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 27(3):548-51. PubMed ID: 20649016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.