216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25322212)
1. Proton beam characterization by proton-induced acoustic emission: simulation studies.
Jones KC; Witztum A; Sehgal CM; Avery S
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(21):6549-63. PubMed ID: 25322212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ionoacoustic characterization of the proton Bragg peak with submillimeter accuracy.
Assmann W; Kellnberger S; Reinhardt S; Lehrack S; Edlich A; Thirolf PG; Moser M; Dollinger G; Omar M; Ntziachristos V; Parodi K
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):567-74. PubMed ID: 25652477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic time-of-flight for proton range verification in water.
Jones KC; Vander Stappen F; Sehgal CM; Avery S
Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5213. PubMed ID: 27587053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How proton pulse characteristics influence protoacoustic determination of proton-beam range: simulation studies.
Jones KC; Seghal CM; Avery S
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(6):2213-42. PubMed ID: 26913839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic-based proton range verification in heterogeneous tissue: simulation studies.
Jones KC; Nie W; Chu JCH; Turian JV; Kassaee A; Sehgal CM; Avery S
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 63(2):025018. PubMed ID: 29176057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of RACT for 3D dose measurement and range verification in a water phantom.
Alsanea F; Moskvin V; Stantz KM
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):937-46. PubMed ID: 25652506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation.
Faddegon BA; Shin J; Castenada CM; Ramos-Méndez J; Daftari IK
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4199-210. PubMed ID: 26133619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Theoretical detection threshold of the proton-acoustic range verification technique.
Ahmad M; Xiang L; Yousefi S; Xing L
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5735-44. PubMed ID: 26429247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-stage ionoacoustic range verification leveraging Monte Carlo and acoustic simulations to stably account for tissue inhomogeneity and accelerator-specific time structure - A simulation study.
Patch SK; Hoff DEM; Webb TB; Sobotka LG; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):783-793. PubMed ID: 29159885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel range-verification method using ionoacoustic wave generated from spherical gold markers for particle-beam therapy: a simulation study.
Takayanagi T; Uesaka T; Kitaoka M; Unlu MB; Umegaki K; Shirato H; Xing L; Matsuura T
Sci Rep; 2019 Mar; 9(1):4011. PubMed ID: 30850625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single pulse protoacoustic range verification using a clinical synchrocyclotron.
Caron J; Gonzalez G; Pandey PK; Wang S; Prather K; Ahmad S; Xiang L; Chen Y
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 68(4):. PubMed ID: 36634371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Range verification of a clinical proton beam in an abdominal phantom by co-registration of ionoacoustics and ultrasound.
Schauer J; Wieser HP; Lascaud J; Huang Y; Vidal M; Herault J; Ntziachristos V; Dollinger G; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jun; 68(12):. PubMed ID: 37220766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On the robustness of multilateration of ionoacoustic signals for localization of the Bragg peak at pre-clinical proton beam energies in water.
Kalunga R; Wieser HP; Dash P; Würl M; Riboldi M; Schreiber J; Assmann W; Parodi K; Lascaud J
Phys Med Biol; 2023 May; 68(10):. PubMed ID: 37011627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical Note: Experimental verification of magnetic field-induced beam deflection and Bragg peak displacement for MR-integrated proton therapy.
Schellhammer SM; Gantz S; Lühr A; Oborn BM; Bussmann M; Hoffmann AL
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3429-3434. PubMed ID: 29763970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An analysis of beam parameters on proton-acoustic waves through an analytic approach.
Kipergil EA; Erkol H; Kaya S; Gulsen G; Unlu MB
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(12):4694-4710. PubMed ID: 28252450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ionoacoustic application of an optical hydrophone to detect proton beam range in water.
Sueyasu S; Takayanagi T; Miyazaki K; Kuriyama Y; Ishi Y; Uesugi T; Unlu MB; Kudo N; Chen Y; Kasamatsu K; Fujii M; Kobayashi M; Rohringer W; Matsuura T
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2438-2449. PubMed ID: 36565440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Energy Spectra of Protons and Generated Secondary Electrons around the Bragg Peak in Materials of Interest in Proton Therapy.
de Vera P; Abril I; Garcia-Molina R
Radiat Res; 2018 Sep; 190(3):282-297. PubMed ID: 29995591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility study of 3D time-reversal reconstruction of proton-induced acoustic signals for dose verification in the head and the liver: A simulation study.
Yu Y; Qi P; Peng H
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4485-4497. PubMed ID: 34120348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.
Titt U; Zheng Y; Vassiliev ON; Newhauser WD
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 18185001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analytical computation of prompt gamma ray emission and detection for proton range verification.
Sterpin E; Janssens G; Smeets J; Vander Stappen F; Prieels D; Priegnitz M; Perali I; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(12):4915-46. PubMed ID: 26057053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]