These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

24 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2532227)

  • 1. A mathematical model of vowel identification by users of cochlear implants.
    Sagi E; Meyer TA; Kaiser AR; Teoh SW; Svirsky MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1069-83. PubMed ID: 20136228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule.
    Greenspan SL; Nusbaum HC; Pisoni DB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jul; 14(3):421-33. PubMed ID: 2969941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evoked cortical activity and speech recognition as a function of the number of simulated cochlear implant channels.
    Friesen LM; Tremblay KL; Rohila N; Wright RA; Shannon RV; Başkent D; Rubinstein JT
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Apr; 120(4):776-82. PubMed ID: 19250865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition.
    Xu L; Thompson CS; Pfingst BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):3255-67. PubMed ID: 15957791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synthetic two-formant vowel perception by some of the better cochlear-implant patients.
    Tyler RS; Tye-Murray N; Moore BC; McCabe BF
    Audiology; 1989; 28(6):301-15. PubMed ID: 2532003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of synthetic vowels by patients using the Symbion multichannel cochlear implant.
    Dorman MF; Dankowski K; McCandless G; Smith L
    Ear Hear; 1989 Feb; 10(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 2721827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Synthetic vowel studies on cochlear implant patients.
    Tong YC; Lim HH; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):876-87. PubMed ID: 3183206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Place coding of vowel formants for cochlear implant patients.
    Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):667-73. PubMed ID: 2212290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The recognition of vowels differing by a single formant by cochlear-implant subjects.
    Tyler RS; Tye-Murray N; Otto SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2107-12. PubMed ID: 2532227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons in cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pauka CK
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 19():1-31. PubMed ID: 2693565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The multi-channel cochlear implant and the relief of severe-to-profound deafness.
    Clark G
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 May; 13(2):69-85. PubMed ID: 22334029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.