194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25323441)
1. Medical physics personnel for medical imaging: requirements, conditions of involvement and staffing levels-French recommendations.
Isambert A; Le Du D; Valéro M; Guilhem MT; Rousse C; Dieudonné A; Blanchard V; Pierrat N; Salvat C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(1-2):130-3. PubMed ID: 25323441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maintenance of certification in radiologic physics.
Thomas SR; Morin RL; Paliwal BR;
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Apr; 3(4):299. PubMed ID: 17412064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Point/Counterpoint: The 2014 initiative can have potentially unintended negative consequences for medical physics in diagnostic imaging and nuclear medicine.
Samei E; Button TM; Orton CG
Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1167-8; discussion 1168-9. PubMed ID: 22380347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Staff requirements in medical radiation physics for diagnostic radiology in Germany: results of a questionnaire].
Leetz HK; Eipper HH; Gfirtner H; Schneider P; Welker K
Rofo; 2004 Mar; 176(3):392-7. PubMed ID: 15026953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AAPM-RSS Medical Physics Practice Guideline 9.a. for SRS-SBRT.
Halvorsen PH; Cirino E; Das IJ; Garrett JA; Yang J; Yin FF; Fairobent LA
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):10-21. PubMed ID: 28786239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recommendations for physics staffing in diagnostic radiology.
Bushong S
Adm Radiol; 1990 Sep; 9(9):23-4, 26-8, 30. PubMed ID: 10107653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics. Policy Statement No. 7.1: The roles, responsibilities and status of the medical physicist including the criteria for the staffing levels in a Medical Physics Department approved by EFOMP Council on 5th February 2016.
Evans S; Christofides S; Brambilla M
Phys Med; 2016 Apr; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 27142957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Staffing levels in medical radiation physics in radiation therapy in Germany. Summary of a questionnaire].
Leetz HK; Eipper HH; Gfirtner H; Schneider P; Welker K
Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 Oct; 179(10):721-6. PubMed ID: 14566481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linking accreditation and certification in medical physics.
Hendee WR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):198-9. PubMed ID: 17411794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis and practical use: the Abt Study of Medical Physicist Work Values for Radiation Oncology Physics Services--round II.
Mills MD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):782-9. PubMed ID: 17411927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for education and training of medical physicists in radiotherapy. Recommendations from an ESTRO/EFOMP working group.
Eudaldo T; Huizenga H; Lamm IL; McKenzie A; Milano F; Schlegel W; Thwaites D; Heeren G; ;
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Feb; 70(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 15028400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The personnel needs of health physics in radiotherapy].
Schneider P; Eipper HH; Gfirtner H; Hering B; Leetz HK; Welker K
Strahlenther Onkol; 1996 Mar; 172(3):148-53; discussion 154-5. PubMed ID: 8721263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Telecommunications, health and radiology: potential synergies for the new millennium].
Lagalla R
Radiol Med; 2001; 102(1-2):14-9. PubMed ID: 11677432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A survey of the role of the UK physicist in nuclear medicine: a report of a joint working group of the British Institute of Radiology, British Nuclear Medicine Society, and the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
Tindale WB; Thorley PJ; Nunan TO; Lewington V; Shields RA; Williams NR
Nucl Med Commun; 2003 Jan; 24(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 12501025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The American Board of Radiology Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Program in Radiologic Physics.
Thomas SR; Hendee WR; Paliwal BR
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):263-7. PubMed ID: 15719977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The opportunity for the medical physicist in quality improvement.
Nagy P
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jun; 11(6):632-3. PubMed ID: 24787574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Point/Counterpoint. The proposed MOC requirements for physicists are reasonable.
Thomas SR; Garrett JA; Orton CG
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2319-22. PubMed ID: 16898432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Demographic characteristics of physicists who evaluate mammographic units.
Rothenberg LN; Deye JA; High MD; Jessop NW; Sternick ES
Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):373-7. PubMed ID: 7824712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The job market of the future: how will the recent change in boards influence the job market for new graduates?
Warren LA; Patel TY; Layman MS; Patel MY
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Feb; 12(2):206-7. PubMed ID: 25240487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the US medical physics community have the optimal certification model for the next decade?
Mills M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 31774617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
