326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25323485)
1. Gene status in HER2 equivocal breast carcinomas: impact of distinct recommendations and contribution of a polymerase chain reaction-based method.
Sapino A; Maletta F; Verdun di Cantogno L; Macrì L; Botta C; Gugliotta P; Scalzo MS; Annaratone L; Balmativola D; Pietribiasi F; Bernardi P; Arisio R; Viberti L; Guzzetti S; Orlassino R; Ercolani C; Mottolese M; Viale G; Marchiò C
Oncologist; 2014 Nov; 19(11):1118-26. PubMed ID: 25323485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast carcinomas with low amplified/equivocal HER2 by Ish: potential supporting role of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
Ercolani C; Marchiò C; Di Benedetto A; Fabi A; Perracchio L; Vici P; Sperati F; Buglioni S; Arena V; Pescarmona E; Sapino A; Terrenato I; Mottolese M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Oct; 36(1):143. PubMed ID: 29029640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the proposed in situ hybridization groups.
Woo JW; Lee K; Chung YR; Jang MH; Ahn S; Park SY
Hum Pathol; 2020 Apr; 98():10-21. PubMed ID: 32027910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Equivocal (HER2 IHC 2+) breast carcinomas: gene-protein assay testing reveals association between genetic heterogeneity, individual cell amplification status and potential treatment benefits.
Pekar G; Kasselaki I; Pekar-Lukacs A; Dekany C; Hellberg D; Tot T
Histopathology; 2019 Jan; 74(2):300-310. PubMed ID: 30113715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Updates on HER2 Assessment in Breast Cancer With Equivocal HER2 Immunohistochemistry Results With Focus on Cases With
Hoda RS; Brogi E; Xu J; Ventura K; Ross DS; Dang C; Robson M; Norton L; Morrow M; Wen HY
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 May; 144(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 31647316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Next-generation assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (ERBB2) amplification status in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on Group 4 by use of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline.
Hoda RS; Bowman AS; Zehir A; Razavi P; Brogi E; Ladanyi M; Arcila ME; Wen HY; Ross DS
Histopathology; 2021 Mar; 78(4):498-507. PubMed ID: 32841416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. HER2 double-equivocal breast cancer in Chinese patients: a high concordance of HER2 status between different blocks from the same tumor.
Liu Y; Wu S; Shi X; Luo Y; Pang J; Wang C; Mao F; Liang Z; Zeng X
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Nov; 178(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 31388934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines.
Press MF; Seoane JA; Curtis C; Quinaux E; Guzman R; Sauter G; Eiermann W; Mackey JR; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Slamon DJ
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Mar; 5(3):366-375. PubMed ID: 30520947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of HER2 status in invasive breast cancers with increased centromere 17 copy number.
Jang MH; Kim EJ; Kim HJ; Chung YR; Park SY
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Aug; 153(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 26223814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. HER2 Gene Amplification Testing by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH): Comparison of the ASCO-College of American Pathologists Guidelines With FISH Scores Used for Enrollment in Breast Cancer International Research Group Clinical Trials.
Press MF; Sauter G; Buyse M; Fourmanoir H; Quinaux E; Tsao-Wei DD; Eiermann W; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Mackey JR; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Campeau A; Mirlacher M; Lindsay MA; Slamon DJ
J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(29):3518-3528. PubMed ID: 27573653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of an alternative chromosome 17 probe and the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists guidelines on fluorescence in situ hybridization for the determination of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
Donaldson AR; Shetty S; Wang Z; Rivera CL; Portier BP; Budd GT; Downs-Kelly E; Lanigan CP; Calhoun BC
Cancer; 2017 Jun; 123(12):2230-2239. PubMed ID: 28192599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of updated HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer--re-evaluation of HERA trial fluorescence in situ hybridization data.
Stoss OC; Scheel A; Nagelmeier I; Schildhaus HU; Henkel T; Viale G; Jasani B; Untch M; Rüschoff J
Mod Pathol; 2015 Dec; 28(12):1528-34. PubMed ID: 26403781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer.
Guo L; Yuan P; Zhang J; Ling Y; Li W; Zhao B; Ying J; Xuan L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 28712009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. HER2 FISH classification of equivocal HER2 IHC breast cancers with use of the 2013 ASCO/CAP practice guideline.
Fan YS; Casas CE; Peng J; Watkins M; Fan L; Chapman J; Ikpatt OF; Gomez C; Zhao W; Reis IM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 155(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 26895325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancers with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2.0 or greater and an average HER2 copy number of less than 4.0 per cell: frequency, immunohistochemical correlation, and clinicopathological features.
Zare SY; Lin L; Alghamdi AG; Daehne S; Roma AA; Hasteh F; Dell'Aquila M; Fadare O
Hum Pathol; 2019 Jan; 83():7-13. PubMed ID: 30121371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of the 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing of invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on tumours assessed as 'equivocal' for HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridization.
Bethune GC; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; MacIntosh RF; Rayson D; Younis T; Thompson K; Barnes PJ
Histopathology; 2015 Dec; 67(6):880-7. PubMed ID: 25913507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
Varga Z; Noske A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy.
Crespo J; Sun H; Wu J; Ding QQ; Tang G; Robinson MK; Chen H; Sahin AA; Lim B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241775. PubMed ID: 33180796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
