301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25324082)
1. Assessment of auditory spatial awareness in complex listening environments.
Brungart DS; Cohen J; Cord M; Zion D; Kalluri S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1808-20. PubMed ID: 25324082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of hearing-aid dynamic range compression on spatial perception in a reverberant environment.
Hassager HG; Wiinberg A; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2556. PubMed ID: 28464692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An evaluation of the performance of two binaural beamformers in complex and dynamic multitalker environments.
Best V; Mejia J; Freeston K; van Hoesel RJ; Dillon H
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):727-35. PubMed ID: 26140298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance.
Borch Petersen E; Lunner T; Vestergaard MD; Sundewall Thorén E
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26836955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Informational Masking in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Measured in a Nonspeech Pattern Identification Task.
Roverud E; Best V; Mason CR; Swaminathan J; Kidd G
Trends Hear; 2016 Apr; 20():. PubMed ID: 27059627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Kreft HA; Wojtczak M; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):901. PubMed ID: 29495696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.
Moore BC; Popelka GR
Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):678-86. PubMed ID: 23859058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants.
Loiselle LH; Dorman MF; Yost WA; Cook SJ; Gifford RH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 59(4):810-8. PubMed ID: 27411035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Blast Injury on Auditory Localization in Military Service Members.
Kubli LR; Brungart D; Northern J
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):457-469. PubMed ID: 29287039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study.
van Esch TE; Kollmeier B; Vormann M; Lyzenga J; Houtgast T; Hällgren M; Larsby B; Athalye SP; Lutman ME; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):305-21. PubMed ID: 23570289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An overview of the major phenomena of the localization of sound sources by normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and aided listeners.
Akeroyd MA
Trends Hear; 2014 Dec; 18():. PubMed ID: 25492094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Undirected head movements of listeners with asymmetrical hearing impairment during a speech-in-noise task.
Brimijoin WO; McShefferty D; Akeroyd MA
Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):162-8. PubMed ID: 22079774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
