BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

796 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25325170)

  • 21. [Modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease].
    Li J; Deng S; Zhao D; Zhao H; Sun Z; Hao Y; Ma Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jul; 23(7):788-92. PubMed ID: 19662977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of bone morphogenetic proteins on frequency of revision surgery, use of autograft bone, and total hospital charges in surgery for lumbar degenerative disease: review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2002 to 2008.
    Dagostino PR; Whitmore RG; Smith GA; Maltenfort MG; Ratliff JK
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 23218827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incidental durotomy during lumbar spine surgery: risk factors and anatomic locations: clinical article.
    Takahashi Y; Sato T; Hyodo H; Kawamata T; Takahashi E; Miyatake N; Tokunaga M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 23199434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Infection risk for primary and revision instrumented lumbar spine fusion in the Medicare population.
    Kurtz SM; Lau E; Ong KL; Carreon L; Watson H; Albert T; Glassman S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Oct; 17(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 22920611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Administrative database concerns: accuracy of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding is poor for preoperative anemia in patients undergoing spinal fusion.
    Golinvaux NS; Bohl DD; Basques BA; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Nov; 39(24):2019-23. PubMed ID: 25202941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: interbody techniques for lumbar fusion.
    Mummaneni PV; Dhall SS; Eck JC; Groff MW; Ghogawala Z; Watters WC; Dailey AT; Resnick DK; Choudhri TF; Sharan A; Wang JC; Kaiser MG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24980588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: midterm clinical outcomes.
    Müslüman AM; Yılmaz A; Cansever T; Cavuşoğlu H; Colak I; Genç HA; Aydın Y
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Apr; 14(4):488-96. PubMed ID: 21314280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Utility of a combined current procedural terminology and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code algorithm in classifying cervical spine surgery for degenerative changes.
    Wang MC; Laud PW; Macias M; Nattinger AB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(22):1843-8. PubMed ID: 21245779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Risk factors of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after lumbar spinal fusion: comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion.
    Lee JC; Kim Y; Soh JW; Shin BJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E339-45. PubMed ID: 24365899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reoperation rates after posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery according to preoperative diagnoses: A national population-based cohort study.
    Park MS; Ju YS; Moon SH; Kim TH; Oh JK; Sung PS; Kim CH; Chung CK; Chang HG
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 184():105408. PubMed ID: 31306891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative analysis of perioperative surgical site infection after minimally invasive versus open posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of hospital billing and discharge data from 5170 patients.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Lerner J; Engelhart L; Knight T; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jun; 14(6):771-8. PubMed ID: 21417699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement fails to reduce overall postoperative complications in fusion surgery.
    Lieber AM; Kirchner GJ; Kerbel YE; Khalsa AS
    Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):212-217. PubMed ID: 30010044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
    Sears W
    Spine J; 2005; 5(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 15749616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions in Denmark 2005-2006].
    Rasmussen S; Jensen CM; Iversen MG; Kehlet H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Sep; 171(39):2804-7. PubMed ID: 19811749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States.
    Pannell WC; Savin DD; Scott TP; Wang JC; Daubs MD
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1719-27. PubMed ID: 24184652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis.
    Resnick DK; Watters WC; Sharan A; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Wang JC; Choudhri TF; Eck J; Ghogawala Z; Groff MW; Dhall SS; Kaiser MG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24980586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Preliminary application of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion with prospace and facet fusion using local autograft.
    Long H; Kazunasa U; Liu S; Akio S; Taito I
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 21(11):1155-9. PubMed ID: 18069464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.
    Lee JC; Jang HD; Shin BJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):1548-57. PubMed ID: 22426447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.