491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25326398)
41. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.
Ng SS; Leung KL; Lee JF; Yiu RY; Li JC; Teoh AY; Leung WW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2418-25. PubMed ID: 18392659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Better operative outcomes achieved with the prone jackknife vs. lithotomy position during abdominoperineal resection in patients with low rectal cancer.
Liu P; Bao H; Zhang X; Zhang J; Ma L; Wang Y; Li C; Wang Z; Gong P
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():39. PubMed ID: 25889121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial.
Kang SB; Park JW; Jeong SY; Nam BH; Choi HS; Kim DW; Lim SB; Lee TG; Kim DY; Kim JS; Chang HJ; Lee HS; Kim SY; Jung KH; Hong YS; Kim JH; Sohn DK; Kim DH; Oh JH
Lancet Oncol; 2010 Jul; 11(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 20610322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Long-term results of extended intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a retrospective study.
Kim HS; Ko S; Oh NG
BMC Surg; 2016 Apr; 16():21. PubMed ID: 27090553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Laparoscopic versus robotic rectal resection for rectal cancer in a veteran population.
Fernandez R; Anaya DA; Li LT; Orcutt ST; Balentine CJ; Awad SA; Berger DH; Albo DA; Artinyan A
Am J Surg; 2013 Oct; 206(4):509-17. PubMed ID: 23809672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes.
Bianchi PP; Rosati R; Bona S; Rottoli M; Elmore U; Ceriani C; Malesci A; Montorsi M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Dec; 50(12):2047-53. PubMed ID: 17906896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives.
Rouanet P; Bertrand MM; Jarlier M; Mourregot A; Traore D; Taoum C; de Forges H; Colombo PE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 25(12):3572-3579. PubMed ID: 30171509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.
van der Pas MH; Haglind E; Cuesta MA; Fürst A; Lacy AM; Hop WC; Bonjer HJ;
Lancet Oncol; 2013 Mar; 14(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 23395398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Evolution of surgery for cancer of the anorectal junction].
Prete F; Prete FP; Nitti P; De Luca R; Vincenti L
Chir Ital; 2007; 59(6):763-70. PubMed ID: 18360980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Oncologic outcomes and perioperative clinicopathologic results after robot-assisted tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Baik SH; Kim NK; Lim DR; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Aug; 20(8):2625-32. PubMed ID: 23417433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced low rectal cancer.
Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Furutani A; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Hino H
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4498-4505. PubMed ID: 29721748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer and comparison with open approach.
Yamamoto S; Fujita S; Akasu T; Inada R; Takawa M; Moriya Y
Dig Surg; 2011; 28(5-6):404-9. PubMed ID: 22189000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Laparoscopic surgery for stage 0/I rectal carcinoma: short-term outcomes of a single-arm phase II trial.
Yamamoto S; Ito M; Okuda J; Fujii S; Yamaguchi S; Yoshimura K; Sugihara K; Watanabe M;
Ann Surg; 2013 Aug; 258(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 23426337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prognostic factors for low rectal cancer patients undergoing intersphincteric resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Lee SY; Jo JS; Kim HJ; Kim CH; Kim YJ; Kim HR
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jun; 111(8):1054-8. PubMed ID: 25977149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review.
Iwamoto M; Kawada K; Hida K; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 15(1):143. PubMed ID: 28764707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The role of the laparoscopy on circumferential resection margin positivity in patients with rectal cancer: long-term outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Dural AC; Keskin M; Balik E; Akici M; Kunduz E; Yamaner S; Asoglu O; Gulluoglu M; Bugra D
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Apr; 25(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 25159046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of oncologic outcomes.
Saklani AP; Lim DR; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Dec; 28(12):1689-98. PubMed ID: 23948968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
