These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25326398)

  • 61. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer.
    Kim JC; Lee JL; Alotaibi AM; Yoon YS; Kim CW; Park IJ
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1137-1145. PubMed ID: 28357501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?
    Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhuo G; Zhao Y; Zhu J; Ding J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Apr; 32(4):587-590. PubMed ID: 27878621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a clinical comparative study].
    Zhou T; Zhang GJ; Liu ZL; Tian HP
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 16(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 23801212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison--open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.
    Kang J; Yoon KJ; Min BS; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Lee KY
    Ann Surg; 2013 Jan; 257(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 23059496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
    Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Laparoscopic Versus Open Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of a Large Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.
    Yamaguchi T; Konishi T; Kinugasa Y; Yamamoto S; Akiyoshi T; Okamura R; Ito M; Nishimura Y; Shiozawa M; Yamaguchi S; Hida K; Sakai Y; Watanabe M
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 Sep; 60(9):954-964. PubMed ID: 28796734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Intersphincteric Resection Has Similar Long-term Oncologic Outcomes Compared With Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Therapy: Results of Propensity Score Analyses.
    Tsukamoto S; Miyake M; Shida D; Ochiai H; Yamada K; Kanemitsu Y
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Sep; 61(9):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 30086052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: early results and medium-term oncological outcome.
    Gash K; Bicsak M; Dixon A
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Dec; 17(12):1071-8. PubMed ID: 26076762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy.
    Saito N; Ono M; Sugito M; Ito M; Morihiro M; Kosugi C; Sato K; Kotaka M; Nomura S; Arai M; Kobatake T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2004 Apr; 47(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 14978613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection: is there any real difference? A comparative single center study.
    Ielpo B; Caruso R; Quijano Y; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Oliva C; Olivares S; Ferri V; Ceron R; Plaza C; Vicente E
    Int J Med Robot; 2014 Sep; 10(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24692203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma.
    Portier G; Ghouti L; Kirzin S; Guimbaud R; Rives M; Lazorthes F
    Br J Surg; 2007 Mar; 94(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 17262755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of outcomes following intersphincteric resection vs low anterior resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Ursi P; Santoro A; Gemini A; Arezzo A; Pironi D; Renzi C; Cirocchi R; Di Matteo FM; Maturo A; D'Andrea V; Sagar J
    G Chir; 2018; 39(3):123-142. PubMed ID: 29923482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Robotic rectal resection in rectal cancer: short term results in a monocentric prospective study].
    Bianchi P; Petz W; Spinoglio G; Belotti D; Bertani E; Zampino MG; Crosta C; Lazzari R; Andreoni B
    Minerva Chir; 2011 Dec; 66(6):527-35. PubMed ID: 22233659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Outcomes of ultra-low anterior resection combined with or without intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer patients.
    Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Park IJ; Yoon YS
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1311-21. PubMed ID: 26141090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Laparoscopic sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction: five-year results.
    Tsang WW; Chung CC; Kwok SY; Li MK
    Ann Surg; 2006 Mar; 243(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 16495700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Analysis of the clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer.
    Tokoro T; Okuno K; Hida J; Ueda K; Yoshifuji T; Daito K; Takemoto M; Sugiura F
    World J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jan; 11():24. PubMed ID: 23356424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
    Martin ST; Heneghan HM; Winter DC
    Br J Surg; 2012 May; 99(5):603-12. PubMed ID: 22246846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.
    Kellokumpu IH; Kairaluoma MI; Nuorva KP; Kautiainen HJ; Jantunen IT
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Aug; 55(8):854-63. PubMed ID: 22810470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection versus an open approach for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Chen H; Ma B; Gao P; Wang H; Song Y; Tong L; Li P; Wang Z
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 15(1):229. PubMed ID: 29282141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal carcinoma--a prospective analysis.
    Ivanov P; Vasilev K; Kotashev G; Grigorov G; Kiossev V; Hristova V
    Khirurgiia (Sofiia); 2013; (1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23847807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.