437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25327648)
41. Critical assessment of proteome-wide label-free absolute abundance estimation strategies.
Ahrné E; Molzahn L; Glatter T; Schmidt A
Proteomics; 2013 Sep; 13(17):2567-78. PubMed ID: 23794183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Relative protein quantification and accessible biology in lung tumor proteomes from four LC-MS/MS discovery platforms.
Stewart PA; Fang B; Slebos RJ; Zhang G; Borne AL; Fellows K; Teer JK; Chen YA; Welsh E; Eschrich SA; Haura EB; Koomen JM
Proteomics; 2017 Mar; 17(6):. PubMed ID: 28195392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Data processing pipelines for comprehensive profiling of proteomics samples by label-free LC-MS for biomarker discovery.
Christin C; Bischoff R; Horvatovich P
Talanta; 2011 Jan; 83(4):1209-24. PubMed ID: 21215856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review.
Bantscheff M; Schirle M; Sweetman G; Rick J; Kuster B
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2007 Oct; 389(4):1017-31. PubMed ID: 17668192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Stable isotope labelling methods in mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics.
Chahrour O; Cobice D; Malone J
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2015 Sep; 113():2-20. PubMed ID: 25956803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Performance of isobaric and isotopic labeling in quantitative plant proteomics.
Nogueira FC; Palmisano G; Schwämmle V; Campos FA; Larsen MR; Domont GB; Roepstorff P
J Proteome Res; 2012 May; 11(5):3046-52. PubMed ID: 22452248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Choice of LC-MS methods for the absolute quantification of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters in human tissue: a comparative cost analysis.
Al Feteisi H; Achour B; Barber J; Rostami-Hodjegan A
AAPS J; 2015 Mar; 17(2):438-46. PubMed ID: 25663651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Implementation and evaluation of relative and absolute quantification in shotgun proteomics with label-free methods.
Grossmann J; Roschitzki B; Panse C; Fortes C; Barkow-Oesterreicher S; Rutishauser D; Schlapbach R
J Proteomics; 2010 Aug; 73(9):1740-6. PubMed ID: 20576481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. RIBAR and xRIBAR: Methods for reproducible relative MS/MS-based label-free protein quantification.
Colaert N; Gevaert K; Martens L
J Proteome Res; 2011 Jul; 10(7):3183-9. PubMed ID: 21604685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Production and use of stable isotope-labeled proteins for absolute quantitative proteomics.
Lebert D; Dupuis A; Garin J; Bruley C; Brun V
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 753():93-115. PubMed ID: 21604118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Variable-Velocity Traveling-Wave Ion Mobility Separation Enhancing Peak Capacity for Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics.
Haynes SE; Polasky DA; Dixit SM; Majmudar JD; Neeson K; Ruotolo BT; Martin BR
Anal Chem; 2017 Jun; 89(11):5669-5672. PubMed ID: 28471653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Extended Range Proteomic Analysis (ERPA): a new and sensitive LC-MS platform for high sequence coverage of complex proteins with extensive post-translational modifications-comprehensive analysis of beta-casein and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).
Wu SL; Kim J; Hancock WS; Karger B
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(4):1155-70. PubMed ID: 16083266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Label-Based and Label-Free Strategies for Protein Quantitation.
Anand S; Samuel M; Ang CS; Keerthikumar S; Mathivanan S
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1549():31-43. PubMed ID: 27975282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Separation methodology to improve proteome coverage depth.
Lenz C; Urlaub H
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2014 Aug; 11(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 24834482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Multidimensional chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry in analysing complex proteomics samples.
Horvatovich P; Hoekman B; Govorukhina N; Bischoff R
J Sep Sci; 2010 Jun; 33(10):1421-37. PubMed ID: 20486207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry for 13C isotopic analysis in life science research.
Godin JP; Fay LB; Hopfgartner G
Mass Spectrom Rev; 2007; 26(6):751-74. PubMed ID: 17853432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Label-free quantitative proteomics trends for protein-protein interactions.
Tate S; Larsen B; Bonner R; Gingras AC
J Proteomics; 2013 Apr; 81():91-101. PubMed ID: 23153790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Software for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling and data independent acquisition.
Huang X; Liu M; Nold MJ; Tian C; Fu K; Zheng J; Geromanos SJ; Ding SJ
Anal Chem; 2011 Sep; 83(18):6971-9. PubMed ID: 21834580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics in Yeast.
Léger T; Garcia C; Videlier M; Camadro JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1361():289-307. PubMed ID: 26483028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Quantitative peptide and protein profiling by mass spectrometry.
Schmidt A; Bisle B; Kislinger T
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 492():21-38. PubMed ID: 19241025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
