152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25327649)
1. Field measurements give biased estimates of functional response parameters, but help explain foraging distributions.
Duijns S; Knot IE; Piersma T; van Gils JA
J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):565-75. PubMed ID: 25327649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intake rates and the functional response in shorebirds (Charadriiformes) eating macro-invertebrates.
Goss-Custard JD; West AD; Yates MG; Caldow RW; Stillman RA; Bardsley L; Castilla J; Castro M; Dierschke V; Durell SE; Eichhorn G; Ens BJ; Exo KM; Udayangani-Fernando PU; Ferns PN; Hockey PA; Gill JA; Johnstone I; Kalejta-Summers B; Masero JA; Moreira F; Nagarajan RV; Owens IP; Pacheco C; Perez-Hurtado A; Rogers D; Scheiffarth G; Sitters H; Sutherland WJ; Triplet P; Worrall DH; Zharikov Y; Zwarts L; Pettifor RA
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 Nov; 81(4):501-29. PubMed ID: 16863594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moving on with foraging theory: incorporating movement decisions into the functional response of a gregarious shorebird.
van Gils JA; van der Geest M; De Meulenaer B; Gillis H; Piersma T; Folmer EO
J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):554-64. PubMed ID: 25283546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Site selection and resource depletion in black-tailed godwits Limosa l. limosa eating rice during northward migration.
Lourenço PM; Mandema FS; Hooijmeijer JC; Granadeiro JP; Piersma T
J Anim Ecol; 2010 May; 79(3):522-8. PubMed ID: 20070431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shorebird predation of horseshoe crab eggs in Delaware Bay: species contrasts and availability constraints.
Gillings S; Atkinson PW; Bardsley SL; Clark NA; Love SE; Robinson RA; Stillman RA; Weber RG
J Anim Ecol; 2007 May; 76(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 17439467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding spatial distributions: negative density-dependence in prey causes predators to trade-off prey quantity with quality.
Bijleveld AI; MacCurdy RB; Chan YC; Penning E; Gabrielson RM; Cluderay J; Spaulding EL; Dekinga A; Holthuijsen S; ten Horn J; Brugge M; van Gils JA; Winkler DW; Piersma T
Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Apr; 283(1828):. PubMed ID: 27053747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diet selection in a molluscivore shorebird across Western Europe: does it show short- or long-term intake rate-maximization?
Quaintenne G; van Gils JA; Bocher P; Dekinga A; Piersma T
J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 19674177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional response of staging semipalmated sandpipers feeding on burrowing amphipods.
Beauchamp G
Oecologia; 2009 Sep; 161(3):651-5. PubMed ID: 19543917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does an optimally foraging oystercatcher obey the functional response?
Wanink J; Zwarts L
Oecologia; 1985 Aug; 67(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 28309851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Landscape-scale experiment demonstrates that Wadden Sea intertidal flats are used to capacity by molluscivore migrant shorebirds.
Kraan C; van Gils JA; Spaans B; Dekinga A; Bijleveld AI; van Roomen M; Kleefstra R; Piersma T
J Anim Ecol; 2009 Nov; 78(6):1259-68. PubMed ID: 19490380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ways to be different: foraging adaptations that facilitate higher intake rates in a northerly wintering shorebird compared with a low-latitude conspecific.
Ruthrauff DR; Dekinga A; Gill RE; van Gils JA; Piersma T
J Exp Biol; 2015 Apr; 218(Pt 8):1188-97. PubMed ID: 25714569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stomach fullness shapes prey choice decisions in crab plovers (Dromas ardeola).
Gommer R; Bom RA; Fijen TPM; van Gils JA
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194824. PubMed ID: 29641542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring the functional responses of farmland birds: an example for a declining seed-feeding bunting.
Smart SL; Stillman RA; Norris KJ
J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jul; 77(4):687-95. PubMed ID: 18577020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Depletion models can predict shorebird distribution at different spatial scales.
Gill JA; Sutherland WJ; Norris K
Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):369-76. PubMed ID: 11270433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Foraging in a tidally structured environment by Red Knots (Calidris canutus): ideal, but not free.
van Gils JA; Spaans B; Dekinga A; Piersma T
Ecology; 2006 May; 87(5):1189-202. PubMed ID: 16761598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A derivation of Holling's type I, II and III functional responses in predator-prey systems.
Dawes JH; Souza MO
J Theor Biol; 2013 Jun; 327():11-22. PubMed ID: 23500600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional response of the predatory mite Chileseius camposi (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on densities of it prey, Panonychus ulmi (Acarina: Tetranychidae).
Sepúlveda F; Carrillo R
Rev Biol Trop; 2008 Sep; 56(3):1255-60. PubMed ID: 19419042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional responses of coccinellid predators: an illustration of a logistic approach.
Pervez A; Omkar
J Insect Sci; 2005; 5():5. PubMed ID: 16299595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predator size, prey size and threshold food densities of diving ducks: does a common prey base support fewer large animals?
Richman SE; Lovvorn JR
J Anim Ecol; 2009 Sep; 78(5):1033-42. PubMed ID: 19426253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Digestive Capacity on the Intake Rate of Toxic and Non-Toxic Prey in an Ecological Context.
Oudman T; Hin V; Dekinga A; van Gils JA
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136144. PubMed ID: 26287951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
