These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 253282)

  • 21. Back to the 80 pound pay target.
    Packham H
    Nurs Mirror; 1979 Jun; 148(23):14-6. PubMed ID: 256096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Student's view: raising the floor.
    Salvage J
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 Nov; 147(19):13. PubMed ID: 250814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nurses are worth more.
    Philpot T
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 Oct; 147(14):17-20. PubMed ID: 250077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The PRB: will it pay off?
    Campbell D
    Nurs Mirror; 1984 Feb; 158(7):10-1. PubMed ID: 6560609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How much should you be paid?
    Occup Health (Lond); 1981 Sep; 33(9):443-6. PubMed ID: 6913852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Leisure galore.
    Watkin B
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 May; 146(21):7. PubMed ID: 247447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stonewall Ennals and top nurses' pay.
    Watkin B
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 Apr; 146(17):10. PubMed ID: 247396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prepare arrows to fire next year.
    Alderton J
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 May; (349):5. PubMed ID: 6563425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The comparability report: where Clegg falls so short.
    Hancock C; Pavitt L
    Nurs Mirror; 1980 Jan; 150(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 6898136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The comparability report: where Clegg falls so short.
    Nurs Mirror; 1980 Jan; 150(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 6899289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A critical professional issue.
    Clark J
    Nurs Times; 1979 Feb; 75(7):270-1. PubMed ID: 253319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Statistics never lie - or do they?
    Pavitt L
    Nurs Mirror; 1981 Sep; 153(12):21. PubMed ID: 6912552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Whole thrust of case is in direct conflict with College's own document. Government's PRB evidence.
    Oldfield S
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1984 Mar; (336):9. PubMed ID: 6560693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The great debate: 'we need more money now!'.
    Vaughan G; Dunwoody G
    Nurs Mirror; 1981 Aug; 153(8):4-5. PubMed ID: 6911723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The way out of the stop-go cycle. Nurses are worth more.
    Wells R
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 Oct; 147(16):16-7. PubMed ID: 250101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. "Dissatisfaction" with Clegg.
    Midwives Chron; 1980 Apr; 93(1106):76. PubMed ID: 6898826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speaking as managers.
    Dopson L
    Nurs Times; 1979 Mar; 75(13):522. PubMed ID: 254113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Newsmakers: why we have waited.
    Ashton K
    Nurs Times; 1978 Nov; 74(44):1790. PubMed ID: 251259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dear Mrs Thatcher.
    MacMillan P
    Nurs Times; 1980 Jun; 76(25):1080. PubMed ID: 6901068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nurses are worth more: protecting the low paid.
    Spanswick A
    Nurs Mirror; 1978 Nov; 147(20):24-5. PubMed ID: 251283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.