These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25328453)

  • 1. Impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty: mechanisms and consequences.
    Brown TD; Elkins JM; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ
    Iowa Orthop J; 2014; 34():1-15. PubMed ID: 25328453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hard-on-hard total hip impingement causes extreme contact stress concentrations.
    Elkins JM; O'Brien MK; Stroud NJ; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):454-63. PubMed ID: 20953853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting cause of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty by patient-specific four-dimensional motion analysis.
    Miki H; Sugano N; Yonenobu K; Tsuda K; Hattori M; Suzuki N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Feb; 28(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 23219052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
    Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors.
    Hernigou P; Roussignol X; Delambre J; Poignard A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impingement-dislocation risk of total hip replacement: effects of cup orientation and patient maneuvers.
    Ghaffari M; Nickmanesh R; Tamannaee N; Farahmand F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6801-4. PubMed ID: 23367491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone-on-bone versus hardware impingement in total hips: a biomechanical study.
    Elkins JM; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    Iowa Orthop J; 2012; 32():17-21. PubMed ID: 23576916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of impingement and third-body abrasion with 28-mm metal-on-metal bearings.
    Clarke IC; Lazennec JY; Brusson A; Savisaar C; Bowsher JG; Burgett M; Donaldson TK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):497-508. PubMed ID: 24297107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociation and Intrapelvic Entrapment of a Dual-mobility Polyethylene Component.
    Fehring KA; Berry DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Apr; 474(4):1072-6. PubMed ID: 26088765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA?
    Chalmers BP; Pallante GD; Taunton MJ; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 29529660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do the Reasons for Ceramic-on-ceramic Revisions Differ From Other Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Migaud H; Putman S; Kern G; Isida R; Girard J; Ramdane N; Delaunay CP; Hamadouche M;
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2190-9. PubMed ID: 27255729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences between the wear couples metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic in the stability against dislocation of total hip replacement.
    Bader R; Steinhauser E; Zimmermann S; Mittelmeier W; Scholz R; Busch R
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 15346740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.
    Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 29529653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morbid obesity may increase dislocation in total hip patients: a biomechanical analysis.
    Elkins JM; Daniel M; Pedersen DR; Singh B; Yack HJ; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Mar; 471(3):971-80. PubMed ID: 22907474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-Mobility Constructs in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Abdel MP
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 May; 33(5):1328-1330. PubMed ID: 29500088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty associated with reduced revision risk for late dislocation?
    Pitto RP; Garland M; Sedel L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3790-5. PubMed ID: 26070775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation.
    Barrack RL
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2003; 11(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 12670135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does dual-mobility cup geometry affect posterior horizontal dislocation distance?
    Heffernan C; Banerjee S; Nevelos J; Macintyre J; Issa K; Markel DC; Mont MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 May; 472(5):1535-44. PubMed ID: 24464508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Course of dislocated posterior hip arthroplasty: A continuous 232-patient series at a mean 10 years' follow up (range, 1-22 years).
    Martinot P; Blairon A; Putman S; Pasquier G; Girard J; Migaud H
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 29277516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of total hip design on dislocation: a computer model and clinical analysis.
    Padgett DE; Lipman J; Robie B; Nestor BJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():48-52. PubMed ID: 16741474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.