401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25328999)
1. Motion facilitates face perception across changes in viewpoint and expression in older adults.
Maguinness C; Newell FN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2266-80. PubMed ID: 25328999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-rigid, but not rigid, motion interferes with the processing of structural face information in developmental prosopagnosia.
Maguinness C; Newell FN
Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():281-95. PubMed ID: 25737056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motion as a cue to face recognition: evidence from congenital prosopagnosia.
Longmore CA; Tree JJ
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Apr; 51(5):864-75. PubMed ID: 23391556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Holistic processing of static and moving faces.
Zhao M; Bülthoff I
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1020-1035. PubMed ID: 28191990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Broadly tuned face representation in older adults assessed by categorical perception.
Lee Y; Smith CR; Grady CL; Hoang N; Moscovitch M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1060-71. PubMed ID: 24490946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring the role of motion in prosopagnosia: recognizing, learning and matching faces.
Lander K; Humphreys G; Bruce V
Neurocase; 2004 Dec; 10(6):462-70. PubMed ID: 15788286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cognitive mechanisms of false facial recognition in older adults.
Edmonds EC; Glisky EL; Bartlett JC; Rapcsak SZ
Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21787088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recognition of moving and static faces by young infants.
Otsuka Y; Konishi Y; Kanazawa S; Yamaguchi MK; Abdi H; O'Toole AJ
Child Dev; 2009; 80(4):1259-71. PubMed ID: 19630907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning the moves: the effect of familiarity and facial motion on person recognition across large changes in viewing format.
Roark DA; O'Toole AJ; Abdi H; Barrett SE
Perception; 2006; 35(6):761-73. PubMed ID: 16836043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A sex difference in interference between identity and expression judgments with static but not dynamic faces.
Stoesz BM; Jakobson LS
J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):26. PubMed ID: 23625643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Face processing changes in normal aging revealed by fMRI adaptation.
Lee Y; Grady CL; Habak C; Wilson HR; Moscovitch M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3433-47. PubMed ID: 21452937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A matching advantage for dynamic human faces.
Thornton IM; Kourtzi Z
Perception; 2002; 31(1):113-32. PubMed ID: 11922118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: dissecting identity with a fusion approach.
O'Toole AJ; Phillips PJ; Weimer S; Roark DA; Ayyad J; Barwick R; Dunlop J
Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 20969886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of motion signals in recognizing subtle facial expressions of emotion.
Bould E; Morris N
Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):167-89. PubMed ID: 17535474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.
Duchaine B; Nakayama K
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic composite faces are processed holistically.
Favelle S; Tobin A; Piepers D; Burke D; Robbins RA
Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():26-32. PubMed ID: 25982714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring the role of characteristic motion when learning new faces.
Lander K; Davies R
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Apr; 60(4):519-26. PubMed ID: 17455062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Memory for age-face associations in younger and older adults: the role of generation and schematic support.
McGillivray S; Castel AD
Psychol Aging; 2010 Dec; 25(4):822-32. PubMed ID: 21058867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Categorizing identity from facial motion.
Girges C; Spencer J; O'Brien J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1832-43. PubMed ID: 25687732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Associative recognition of face pairs by younger and older adults: the role of familiarity-based processing.
Rhodes MG; Castel AD; Jacoby LL
Psychol Aging; 2008 Jun; 23(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 18573000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
