These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25329044)

  • 1. The spider does not always win the fight for attention: Disengagement from threat is modulated by goal set.
    Vromen JM; Lipp OV; Remington RW
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(7):1185-96. PubMed ID: 25329044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threat captures attention, but not automatically: Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to threat distractors.
    Vromen JM; Lipp OV; Remington RW; Becker SI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2266-79. PubMed ID: 27234013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When spiders appear suddenly: spider-phobic patients are distracted by task-irrelevant spiders.
    Gerdes AB; Alpers GW; Pauli P
    Behav Res Ther; 2008 Feb; 46(2):174-87. PubMed ID: 18154873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective visual working memory in fear of spiders: the role of automaticity and material-specificity.
    Reinecke A; Becker ES; Rinck M
    J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Dec; 23(8):1053-63. PubMed ID: 19643570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speeded detection and increased distraction in fear of spiders: evidence from eye movements.
    Rinck M; Reinecke A; Ellwart T; Heuer K; Becker ES
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2005 May; 114(2):235-48. PubMed ID: 15869354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How preferential is the preferential encoding of threatening stimuli? Working memory biases in specific anxiety and the Attentional Blink.
    Reinecke A; Rinck M; Becker ES
    J Anxiety Disord; 2008 May; 22(4):655-70. PubMed ID: 17681743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. But what about the Empress of Racnoss? The allocation of attention to spiders and Doctor Who in a visual search task is predicted by fear and expertise.
    Purkis HM; Lester KJ; Field AP
    Emotion; 2011 Dec; 11(6):1484-8. PubMed ID: 21707142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expectancy influences on attention to threat are only weak and transient: Behavioral and physiological evidence.
    Aue T; Chauvigné LA; Bristle M; Okon-Singer H; Guex R
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Dec; 121(Pt B):173-186. PubMed ID: 27396748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interrelationships between spider fear associations, attentional disengagement and self-reported fear: a preliminary test of a dual-systems model.
    Ouimet AJ; Radomsky AS; Barber KC
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(8):1428-44. PubMed ID: 22676077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
    Anderson BA; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of fear and expectancies in capture of covert attention by spiders.
    Devue C; Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
    Emotion; 2011 Aug; 11(4):768-75. PubMed ID: 21604868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional modulation of visual-evoked potentials by threat: investigating the effect of evolutionary relevance.
    Brown C; El-Deredy W; Blanchette I
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 20888109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating implicit spider fear associations using the Go/No-go Association Task.
    Teachman BA
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2007 Jun; 38(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 17101115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fear-object perception: does it entail the involuntary capture of attention?
    Sebastiani L; Castellani E; Dalessandro L
    Arch Ital Biol; 2010 Mar; 148(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 20426252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: preferential attention without implicit valence.
    Purkis HM; Lipp OV
    Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):314-23. PubMed ID: 17516810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological correlates of threat processing in spider phobics.
    Kolassa IT; Musial F; Mohr A; Trippe RH; Miltner WH
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Sep; 42(5):520-30. PubMed ID: 16176374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hypervigilance-avoidance pattern in spider phobia.
    Pflugshaupt T; Mosimann UP; von Wartburg R; Schmitt W; Nyffeler T; Müri RM
    J Anxiety Disord; 2005; 19(1):105-16. PubMed ID: 15488370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation.
    Brockmole JR; Boot WR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):808-15. PubMed ID: 19485693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fear, but not fear-relevance, modulates reaction times in visual search with animal distractors.
    Soares SC; Esteves F; Flykt A
    J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Jan; 23(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 18565724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.