These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25329078)

  • 1. Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.
    Yap MJ; Sibley DE; Balota DA; Ratcliff R; Rueckl J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):597-613. PubMed ID: 25329078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Sibley DE; Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 21728459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in Cantonese Chinese word recognition: Insights from the Chinese Lexicon Project.
    Lim RY; Yap MJ; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):504-518. PubMed ID: 32019427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bigram frequency, number of syllables and morphemes and their effects on lexical decision and word naming.
    Muncer SJ; Knight D; Adams JW
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2014 Jun; 43(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 23613200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.
    Hendrix P; Sun CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):157-183. PubMed ID: 31999159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.
    New B; Ferrand L; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 16724767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
    Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision.
    Muncer SJ; Knight DC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2221-30. PubMed ID: 22804754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can response congruency effects be obtained in masked priming lexical decision?
    Fernández-López M; Marcet A; Perea M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1683-1702. PubMed ID: 30359052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition.
    Binder JR; McKiernan KA; Parsons ME; Westbury CF; Possing ET; Kaufman JN; Buchanan L
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 15(3):372-93. PubMed ID: 12729490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
    Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations.
    Kinoshita S; Norris D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 19210078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):2022-2038. PubMed ID: 30117382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What can megastudies tell us about the orthographic structure of English words?
    Chetail F; Balota D; Treiman R; Content A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1519-40. PubMed ID: 25208136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision tasks.
    Perea M; Rosa E; Gómez C
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 12713243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.
    Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.
    Keuleers E; Lacey P; Rastle K; Brysbaert M
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):287-304. PubMed ID: 21720920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Persian Lexicon Project: minimized orthographic neighbourhood effects in a dense language.
    Nemati F; Westbury C; Hollis G; Haghbin H
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Oct; 51(5):957-979. PubMed ID: 35366147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.