These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25329080)

  • 1. Distraction control processes in free recall: benefits and costs to performance.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hodgetts HM; Beaman CP; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):118-33. PubMed ID: 25329080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic cognitive control of irrelevant sound: Increased task engagement attenuates semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1462-74. PubMed ID: 26191618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibitory control in memory: evidence for negative priming in free recall.
    Marsh JE; Beaman CP; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1377-88. PubMed ID: 22468802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distraction of eye-hand coordination varies with working memory capacity.
    Domkin D; Sörqvist P; Richter HO
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 23406167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working memory capacity affects the interference control of distractors at auditory gating.
    Tsuchida Y; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 516(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 22484011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age differences and format effects in working memory.
    Foos PW; Goolkasian P
    Exp Aging Res; 2010 Jul; 36(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 20544448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic priming by irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Körner U; Buchner A; Bell R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1205-1210. PubMed ID: 27798754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Episodic long-term memory of spoken discourse masked by speech: what is the role for working memory capacity?
    Sörqvist P; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 55(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 22199182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic interference in a recognition task.
    Lutz J; Wuensch KL
    J Gen Psychol; 1989 Oct; 116(4):371-84. PubMed ID: 2592957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why do participants initiate free recall of short lists of words with the first list item? Toward a general episodic memory explanation.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1551-67. PubMed ID: 24933695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words.
    Parmentier FB; Turner J; Perez L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 23339333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Disruption of short-term memory by distractor speech: does content matter?
    Bell R; Mund I; Buchner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):146-68. PubMed ID: 20544562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of cross-modal and intramodal division of attention on perceptual implicit memory.
    Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Mar; 29(2):262-76. PubMed ID: 12696814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Specific foreknowledge reduces auditory distraction by irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):692-702. PubMed ID: 25621576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory distraction eliminates retrieval induced forgetting: implications for the processing of unattended sound.
    Marsh JE; Sörqvist P; Beaman CP; Jones DM
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(5):368-75. PubMed ID: 23681014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working-memory capacity predicts the executive control of visual search among distractors: the influences of sustained and selective attention.
    Poole BJ; Kane MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1430-54. PubMed ID: 19123118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual information can hinder working memory processing of speech.
    Mishra S; Lunner T; Stenfelt S; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1120-32. PubMed ID: 23785180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech-in-speech perception and executive function involvement.
    Perrone-Bertolotti M; Tassin M; Meunier F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180084. PubMed ID: 28708830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in working memory capacity and distractor processing: possible contribution of top-down inhibitory control.
    Minamoto T; Osaka M; Osaka N
    Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 1335():63-73. PubMed ID: 20381462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.