These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25329083)

  • 41. Testing a model of componential processing of multi-symbol numbers-evidence from measurement units.
    Huber S; Bahnmueller J; Klein E; Moeller K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1417-23. PubMed ID: 25651800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Qualitatively different coding of symbolic and nonsymbolic numbers in the human brain.
    Lyons IM; Ansari D; Beilock SL
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Feb; 36(2):475-88. PubMed ID: 25238646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. On the internal representation of numerical magnitude and physical size.
    Fitousi D
    Exp Psychol; 2014; 61(2):149-63. PubMed ID: 24149238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Numerical distance effects in visual search.
    Schwarz W; Eiselt AK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1098-103. PubMed ID: 22777735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The association between symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing and mental versus algorithmic subtraction in adults.
    Linsen S; Torbeyns J; Verschaffel L; Reynvoet B; De Smedt B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Mar; 165():34-42. PubMed ID: 26914586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: now you see it, now you don't.
    Costa A; Hernández M; Costa-Faidella J; Sebastián-Gallés N
    Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):135-49. PubMed ID: 19729156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Counting on the motor system: rapid action planning reveals the format- and magnitude-dependent extraction of numerical quantity.
    Chapman CS; Gallivan JP; Wood DK; Milne JL; Ansari D; Culham JC; Goodale MA
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):30. PubMed ID: 24672020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Exploring the developmental changes in automatic two-digit number processing.
    Chan WW; Au TK; Tang J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Jul; 109(3):263-74. PubMed ID: 21397247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. On verbal/nonverbal modality dependence of left and right inferior prefrontal activation during performance of flanker interference task.
    Morimoto HM; Hirose S; Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Asari T; Yamashita K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 20(11):2006-14. PubMed ID: 18416674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Is 26 + 26 smaller than 24 + 28? Estimating the approximate magnitude of repeated versus different numbers.
    Charras P; Brod G; Lupiáñez J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):163-73. PubMed ID: 22042595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Numerosity-length interference: a Stroop experiment.
    Dormal V; Pesenti M
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 17953149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Single-digit Arabic numbers do not automatically activate magnitude representations in adults or in children: evidence from the symbolic same-different task.
    Wong B; Szücs D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):488-98. PubMed ID: 24076332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The development of automated access to symbolic and non-symbolic number knowledge in children: an ERP study.
    Gebuis T; Herfs IK; Kenemans JL; de Haan EH; van der Smagt MJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 30(10):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 19912334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Gender differences on the semantic flanker task using transposed-letter target words.
    Judge J; Taylor PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):2008-17. PubMed ID: 22524791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Relational SNARC: Spatial Representation of Nonsymbolic Ratios.
    Meng R; Matthews PG; Toomarian EY
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Aug; 43(8):e12778. PubMed ID: 31446660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks.
    Freitas AL; Bahar M; Yang S; Banai R
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Dec; 18(12):1040-3. PubMed ID: 18031409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quantitative relation between conflict and response inhibition in the Flanker task.
    Takezawa T; Miyatani M
    Psychol Rep; 2005 Oct; 97(2):515-26. PubMed ID: 16342579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study.
    Kaufmann L; Koppelstaetter F; Delazer M; Siedentopf C; Rhomberg P; Golaszewski S; Felber S; Ischebeck A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):888-98. PubMed ID: 15808989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Dissociating estimation from comparison and response eliminates parietal involvement in sequential numerosity perception.
    Cavdaroglu S; Katz C; Knops A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 116():135-48. PubMed ID: 25887262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The mental representation of the magnitude of symbolic and nonsymbolic ratios in adults.
    Meert G; Grégoire J; Seron X; Noël MP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):702-24. PubMed ID: 22217316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.