98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25329084)
1. Disruption of relational processing underlies poor memory for order.
Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):831-40. PubMed ID: 25329084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of item and relational processing on incidental long-term memory for order.
Tehan G; Fallon AB; Randall N
Memory; 1997 Jul; 5(4):457-82. PubMed ID: 9282219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: a serial recognition paradigm.
Gisselgård J; Uddén J; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 16777043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Not all order memory is equal: Test demands reveal dissociations in memory for sequence information.
Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 27656871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Item- and task-level processes in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: positive and negative correlates of encoding.
Reynolds JR; Donaldson DI; Wagner AD; Braver TS
Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1472-83. PubMed ID: 15050572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The item-order distinction and the generation effect: the importance of order information in long-term memory.
Burns DJ
Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(4):567-80. PubMed ID: 8989858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two sources of information in reconstructing event sequence.
Jonker TR; MacLeod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1013-1022. PubMed ID: 29648862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Concreteness effects in short-term memory: a test of the item-order hypothesis.
Roche J; Tolan GA; Tehan G
Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Dec; 65(4):245-53. PubMed ID: 21823786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing the item-order account of design effects using the production effect.
Jonker TR; Levene M; Macleod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):441-8. PubMed ID: 24219087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brain oscillatory subsequent memory effects differ in power and long-range synchronization between semantic and survival processing.
Fellner MC; Bäuml KH; Hanslmayr S
Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 79():361-70. PubMed ID: 23664950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attending to behaviorally relevant moments enhances incidental relational memory.
Turker HB; Swallow KM
Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 30097907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Categorical-relational and order-relational information in memory for subject-performed and experimenter-performed actions.
Golly-Haring C; Engelkamp J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):965-75. PubMed ID: 14516228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-domain interference costs during concurrent verbal and spatial serial memory tasks are asymmetric.
Morey CC; Mall JT
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1777-97. PubMed ID: 22512308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direction of report in spatial and verbal serial short-term memory.
Farrand P; Jones D
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 8920100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive memory: the survival scenario enhances item-specific processing relative to a moving scenario.
Burns DJ; Hart J; Griffith SE; Burns AD
Memory; 2013; 21(6):695-706. PubMed ID: 23259675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Drawing enhances item information but undermines sequence information in memory.
Jonker TR; Wammes JD; MacLeod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):689-699. PubMed ID: 30211591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.
Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA
Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Turning simple span into complex span: Time for decay or interference from distractors?
Lewandowsky S; Geiger SM; Morrell DB; Oberauer K
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):958-78. PubMed ID: 20565212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
