These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25329628)

  • 1. Improving the efficiency of intraoral scanning.
    Liu W; Huang GJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2014 Sep; 48(9):549-54. PubMed ID: 25329628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bite registration in Cerec and in lab.
    Frank E; Frank S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2012; 15(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 22891418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New applications for three-dimensional follow-up and quality control using optical impression systems and OraCheck.
    Zaruba M; Ender A; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 24791465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Technique for Digital Impression and Bite Registration for a Single Edentulous Arch.
    Fang Y; Fang JH; Jeong SM; Choi BH
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e519-e523. PubMed ID: 29522269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3D-printed custom trays with a Gothic arch for centric relation recording and definitive impression making for complete dentures: A dental technique.
    Qu F; Du X; Liu WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 30006221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of intraoral 3D scanning and conventional impressions for fabrication of orthodontic retainers.
    Vasudavan S; Sullivan SR; Sonis AL
    J Clin Orthod; 2010 Aug; 44(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 21105587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoral scanning of hard and soft tissues for partial removable dental prosthesis fabrication.
    Kattadiyil MT; Mursic Z; AlRumaih H; Goodacre CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):444-8. PubMed ID: 24882595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The face scan as a means for the visualization of complex prosthetic reconstructions.
    Reich S; Peters F; Schenk O; Hartkamp O
    Int J Comput Dent; 2016; 19(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 27644180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants based on wavefront sampling technology.
    Moreno A; Giménez B; Özcan M; Pradíes G
    Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 23817542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A scanning method for the dental casts of intercuspal position].
    Wang Y; Zhao YJ; Lv PJ; Li ZK
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2006 Jun; 38(3):298-300. PubMed ID: 16778976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A quantum leap in dental technology.
    Pugliese R
    Pa Dent J (Harrisb); 2007; 74(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 17427583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital impressions for the fabrication of aesthetic ceramic restorations: a case report.
    Glassman S
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2009; 21(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 19456058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "No touch" digital restorations.
    Ehrlich T
    Todays FDA; 2014; 26(3):52-3. PubMed ID: 24988734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment.
    Fasbinder DJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010; 31 Spec No 4():2-11; quiz 12. PubMed ID: 21049823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology.
    van der Zel JM
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 18482361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of a wax bite wafer and a double computed tomography scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model.
    Swennen GR; Mommaerts MY; Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Lamoral P; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 17538314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided orthognathic surgery.
    Gelesko S; Markiewicz MR; Weimer K; Bell RB
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2012 Mar; 20(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 22365433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
    Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of workflow for recording virtual bite in the planning of orthognathic operations.
    Nilsson J; Thor A; Kamer L
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):384-6. PubMed ID: 25631397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.