These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25329961)

  • 1. Estimating risk of low radiation doses - a critical review of the BEIR VII report and its use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.
    Calabrese EJ; O'Connor MK
    Radiat Res; 2014 Nov; 182(5):463-74. PubMed ID: 25329961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():452-458. PubMed ID: 27974149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Update on linear non-threshold dose-response model and implications for diagnostic radiology procedures.
    Preston RJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 18849687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Oct; 241():289-302. PubMed ID: 29843011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response to Comments on "Estimating Risks of Low Radiation Doses-A Critical Review of the BEIR VII Report and Its Use of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Hypothesis".
    O'Connor MK; Calabrese EJ
    Radiat Res; 2015 Apr; 183(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 25807317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Diagnostic radiation and the risk of cancer].
    Kai M
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2005 Sep; 32(9):1229-34. PubMed ID: 16184914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of low-dose radiation and the BEIR VII report: A critical review of what it does and doesn't say.
    O'Connor MK
    Phys Med; 2017 Nov; 43():153-158. PubMed ID: 28826776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cancer incidence and mortality after low-dose radiation exposure: epidemiological aspects].
    Vaĭserman A; Mekhova LV; Koshel' NM; Voĭtenko VP
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2010; 50(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 21434396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The BEIR VII Estimates of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks Are Based on Faulty Assumptions and Data Analyses: A Call for Reassessment.
    Siegel JA; Greenspan BS; Maurer AH; Taylor AT; Phillips WT; Van Nostrand D; Sacks B; Silberstein EB
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1017-1019. PubMed ID: 29475999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of low level radiation-what's new?
    Royal HD
    Semin Nucl Med; 2008 Sep; 38(5):392-402. PubMed ID: 18662560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
    Doss M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comments on Estimating Risks of Low Radiation Doses-A Critical Review of the BEIR VII Report and Its Use of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) Hypothesis by Edward J. Calabrese and Michael K. O'Connor.
    Crowley KD; Cullings HM; Landes RD; Shore RE; Ullrich RL
    Radiat Res; 2015 Apr; 183(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 25807319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 16468064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept.
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 87(9):1621-33. PubMed ID: 23887208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update.
    Boice JD
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 28532210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Gofman-Tamplin Cancer Risk Controversy and Its Impact on the Creation of BEIR I and the Acceptance of LNT.
    Calabrese E
    Med Lav; 2023 Feb; 114(1):e2023007. PubMed ID: 36790405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The linear no-threshold debate: where do we go from here?
    Mossman KL
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):279-84; discussion 300. PubMed ID: 9547494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cancer and non-cancer effects in Japanese atomic bomb survivors.
    Little MP
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A43-59. PubMed ID: 19454804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
    Scott BR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.