These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25329961)

  • 21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency radiogenic risk projections: uncertainty analysis.
    Pawel DJ
    Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):26-40. PubMed ID: 23192084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology.
    Ron E
    Radiat Res; 1998 Nov; 150(5 Suppl):S30-41. PubMed ID: 9806607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. EPA adopts LNT: New historical perspectives.
    Calabrese EJ
    Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Aug; 308():110-112. PubMed ID: 31108044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy.
    Hendee WR; O'Connor MK
    Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):312-21. PubMed ID: 22821690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy?
    Charles MW
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation?
    Averbeck D
    Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 19820459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.
    Brenner DJ; Sachs RK
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 16470411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. WE-C-217A-03: Biology versus Epidemiology: The Need for an Integrated Model of Radiation Risk.
    Vetter D
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part27):3952-3953. PubMed ID: 28519988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cancer risk assessment foundation unraveling: new historical evidence reveals that the US National Academy of Sciences (US NAS), Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation (BEAR) Committee Genetics Panel falsified the research record to promote acceptance of the LNT.
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2015 Apr; 89(4):649-50. PubMed ID: 25600588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation?
    Wall BF; Kendall GM; Edwards AA; Bouffler S; Muirhead CR; Meara JR
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Apr; 79(940):285-94. PubMed ID: 16585719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the origins of the linear no-threshold (LNT) dogma by means of untruths, artful dodges and blind faith.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():432-42. PubMed ID: 26248082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.
    Breckow J
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiation carcinogenesis in humans: is it necessary to revise exposure dose limits based on recent estimates of lifetime risks?
    Chau NP
    Health Phys; 1987 Jun; 52(6):753-61. PubMed ID: 3583739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations.
    Calabrese EJ
    Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():6-25. PubMed ID: 30763547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the estimation of radiation-induced cancer risks from very low doses of radiation and how to communicate these risks.
    Mattsson S; Nilsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):17-21. PubMed ID: 25802468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radar commentary: Use of linear no-threshold hypothesis in radiation protection regulation in the United States.
    Siegel JA; Stabin MG
    Health Phys; 2012 Jan; 102(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 22134084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dose-effect relationships, epidemiological analysis and the derivation of low dose risk.
    Leenhouts HP; Chadwick KH
    J Radiol Prot; 2011 Mar; 31(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 21346287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Health risks of low photon energy imaging.
    Redpath JL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):528-33. PubMed ID: 17261539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A framework for estimating radiation-related cancer risks in Japan from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident.
    Walsh L; Zhang W; Shore RE; Auvinen A; Laurier D; Wakeford R; Jacob P; Gent N; Anspaugh LR; Schüz J; Kesminiene A; van Deventer E; Tritscher A; del Rosarion Pérez M
    Radiat Res; 2014 Nov; 182(5):556-72. PubMed ID: 25251702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.