BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25331003)

  • 1. The Add-Arm Design for Unimodal Response Curve with Unknown Mode.
    Chang M; Wang J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):1039-64. PubMed ID: 25331003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seamless Phase II/III combination study through response adaptive randomization.
    Wang L; Cui L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1177-87. PubMed ID: 18027224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An adaptive design to bridge the gap between Phase 2b/3 microbicide effectiveness trials and evidence required for licensure.
    Taylor DJ; Grobler A; Abdool Karim SS
    Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 22610168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An adaptive design for phase II non-oncology dose selection clinical trials.
    Su Z
    Clin Drug Investig; 2010; 30(6):397-403. PubMed ID: 20373828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal designs for two-arm, phase II clinical trial design with multiple constraints.
    Mayo MS; Mahnken JD; Soong SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):106-24. PubMed ID: 20077252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practical guidelines for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials that use Bayesian methods.
    Kimani PK; Glimm E; Maurer W; Hutton JL; Stallard N
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2068-85. PubMed ID: 22437262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Group-sequential methods for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials.
    Stallard N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):787-801. PubMed ID: 21516569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian adaptive design for multi-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trials.
    Xie F; Ji Y; Tremmel L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):739-48. PubMed ID: 22426247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design.
    Taylor JM; Braun TM; Li Z
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):335-48. PubMed ID: 17060208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A varying-stage adaptive phase II/III clinical trial design.
    Dong G
    Stat Med; 2014 Apr; 33(8):1272-87. PubMed ID: 24273128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of single-arm vs. randomized phase II clinical trials: a Bayesian approach.
    Sambucini V
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):474-89. PubMed ID: 24896838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical aspects of the TNK-S2B trial of tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: an efficient, dose-adaptive, seamless phase II/III design.
    Levin B; Thompson JL; Chakraborty B; Levy G; MacArthur R; Haley EC
    Clin Trials; 2011 Aug; 8(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 21737464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A case study of modeling and exposure-response prediction for count data.
    Quan H; Mao X; Wei L; Wang L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(5):1073-90. PubMed ID: 24914574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of dose-response for count data using a generalized MCP-Mod approach in an adaptive dose-ranging trial.
    Mercier F; Bornkamp B; Ohlssen D; Wallstroem E
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 26083135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applications of Bayesian statistical methodology to clinical trial design: A case study of a phase 2 trial with an interim futility assessment in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
    Smith CL; Jin Y; Raddad E; McNearney TA; Ni X; Monteith D; Brown R; Deeg MA; Schnitzer T
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 30321909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive sequential testing for multiple comparisons.
    Gao P; Liu L; Mehta C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(5):1035-58. PubMed ID: 24926848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size computation in phase II designs combining the A'Hern design and the Sargent and Goldberg design.
    Neven A; Mauer M; Hasan B; Sylvester R; Collette L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Mar; 30(2):305-321. PubMed ID: 31331234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative evaluation of single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Pond GR; Abbasi S
    Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 21511687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-stage response adaptive randomization designs for multi-arm trials with binary outcome.
    Lu X; Shan G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):526-538. PubMed ID: 37452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some drop-the-loser designs for monitoring multiple doses.
    Joshua Chen YH; Demets DL; Gordon Lan KK
    Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(17):1793-807. PubMed ID: 20658548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.