These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25331167)

  • 1. The functional response predicts the effect of resource distribution on the optimal movement rate of consumers.
    Calcagno V; Grognard F; Hamelin FM; Wajnberg É; Mailleret L
    Ecol Lett; 2014 Dec; 17(12):1570-9. PubMed ID: 25331167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What's your move? Movement as a link between personality and spatial dynamics in animal populations.
    Spiegel O; Leu ST; Bull CM; Sih A
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Jan; 20(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 28000433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal movement strategies for social foragers in unpredictable environments.
    Hancock PA; Milner-Gulland EJ
    Ecology; 2006 Aug; 87(8):2094-102. PubMed ID: 16937648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moving on with foraging theory: incorporating movement decisions into the functional response of a gregarious shorebird.
    van Gils JA; van der Geest M; De Meulenaer B; Gillis H; Piersma T; Folmer EO
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Mar; 84(2):554-64. PubMed ID: 25283546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temperature dependence of trophic interactions are driven by asymmetry of species responses and foraging strategy.
    Dell AI; Pawar S; Savage VM
    J Anim Ecol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):70-84. PubMed ID: 23692182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How optimal foragers should respond to habitat changes: a reanalysis of the Marginal Value Theorem.
    Calcagno V; Mailleret L; Wajnberg É; Grognard F
    J Math Biol; 2014 Nov; 69(5):1237-65. PubMed ID: 24158484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining the functional form of density dependence: deductive approaches for consumer-resource systems having a single resource.
    Abrams PA
    Am Nat; 2009 Sep; 174(3):321-30. PubMed ID: 19627228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The roles of spatial heterogeneity and adaptive movement in stabilizing (or destabilizing) simple metacommunities.
    Ruokolainen L; Abrams PA; McCann KS; Shuter BJ
    J Theor Biol; 2011 Dec; 291():76-87. PubMed ID: 21945147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Panmictic and Clonal Evolution on a Single Patchy Resource Produces Polymorphic Foraging Guilds.
    Getz WM; Salter R; Lyons AJ; Sippl-Swezey N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133732. PubMed ID: 26274613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Linking rates of diffusion and consumption in relation to resources.
    Avgar T; Kuefler D; Fryxell JM
    Am Nat; 2011 Aug; 178(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 21750382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial dynamics of communities with intraguild predation: the role of dispersal strategies.
    Amarasekare P
    Am Nat; 2007 Dec; 170(6):819-31. PubMed ID: 18171165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patterns of dispersal and dynamics among habitat patches varying in quality.
    Donahue MJ; Holyoak M; Feng C
    Am Nat; 2003 Sep; 162(3):302-17. PubMed ID: 12970839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Movement of foraging Tundra Swans explained by spatial pattern in cryptic food densities.
    Klaassen RH; Nolet BA; Bankert D
    Ecology; 2006 Sep; 87(9):2244-54. PubMed ID: 16995625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Size-dependent movement explains why bigger is better in fragmented landscapes.
    Hillaert J; Hovestadt T; Vandegehuchte ML; Bonte D
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Nov; 8(22):10754-10767. PubMed ID: 30519404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection.
    Van Moorter B; Rolandsen CM; Basille M; Gaillard JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 25980987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of predator and prey movement into sink habitats.
    Schreiber SJ; Saltzman E
    Am Nat; 2009 Jul; 174(1):68-81. PubMed ID: 19456263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of non-random dispersal strategies on spatial coexistence mechanisms.
    Amarasekare P
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):282-93. PubMed ID: 19682160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How does adaptive consumer movement affect population dynamics in consumer-resource metacommunities with homogeneous patches?
    Abrams PA; Ruokolainen L
    J Theor Biol; 2011 May; 277(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 21371481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prior knowledge about spatial pattern affects patch assessment rather than movement between patches in tactile-feeding mallard.
    Klaassen RH; Nolet BA; VAN Leeuwen CH
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Jan; 76(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 17184349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal Bayesian foraging policies and prey population dynamics-some comments on Rodriguez-Girones and Vasquez.
    Olsson O; Holmgren NM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Jun; 57(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 10900189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.