These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25331427)

  • 1. Using the Eeva Test™ adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experience.
    Diamond MP; Suraj V; Behnke EJ; Yang X; Angle MJ; Lambe-Steinmiller JC; Watterson R; Athayde Wirka K; Chen AA; Shen S
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Jan; 32(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 25331427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: results from a prospective multicenter trial.
    Conaghan J; Chen AA; Willman SP; Ivani K; Chenette PE; Boostanfar R; Baker VL; Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Gvakharia M; Loewke KE; Shen S
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):412-9.e5. PubMed ID: 23721712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Embryo selection using time-lapse analysis (Early Embryo Viability Assessment) in conjunction with standard morphology: a prospective two-center pilot study.
    Kieslinger DC; De Gheselle S; Lambalk CB; De Sutter P; Kostelijk EH; Twisk JW; van Rijswijk J; Van den Abbeel E; Vergouw CG
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2450-2457. PubMed ID: 27619774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo.
    Kaser DJ; Farland LV; Missmer SA; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1604-1611. PubMed ID: 28854587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.
    Storr A; Venetis CA; Cooke S; Kilani S; Ledger W
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):307-314. PubMed ID: 28031323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles with automatic time-lapse instrumentation combined with the early embryo viability assessment score.
    Kokunai K; Yamashita Y; Inoue T; Taguchi S; Tsujimoto Y; Hirao K; Yamamoto S; Nakamura N; Terai Y; Ohmichi M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Jul; 47(7):2387-2393. PubMed ID: 33870610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.
    Minasi MG; Colasante A; Riccio T; Ruberti A; Casciani V; Scarselli F; Spinella F; Fiorentino F; Varricchio MT; Greco E
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2245-54. PubMed ID: 27591227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection.
    Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Palao L; Witmer J; Palao LM; Gvakharia M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):369-75.e6. PubMed ID: 26604069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of the addition of Early Embryo Viability Assessment to morphological evaluation on the accuracy of embryo selection on day 3 or day 5: a retrospective analysis.
    Revelli A; Canosa S; Carosso A; Filippini C; Paschero C; Gennarelli G; Delle Piane L; Benedetto C
    J Ovarian Res; 2019 Aug; 12(1):73. PubMed ID: 31399038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical outcomes of uninterrupted embryo culture with or without time-lapse-based embryo selection versus interrupted standard culture (SelecTIMO): a three-armed, multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.
    Kieslinger DC; Vergouw CG; Ramos L; Arends B; Curfs MHJM; Slappendel E; Kostelijk EH; Pieters MHEC; Consten D; Verhoeven MO; Besselink DE; Broekmans F; Cohlen BJ; Smeenk JMJ; Mastenbroek S; de Koning CH; van Kasteren YM; Moll E; van Disseldorp J; Brinkhuis EA; Kuijper EAM; van Baal WM; van Weering HGI; van der Linden PJQ; Gerards MH; Bossuyt PM; van Wely M; Lambalk CB
    Lancet; 2023 Apr; 401(10386):1438-1446. PubMed ID: 37004670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time-lapse imaging of preimplantation embryos.
    Conaghan J
    Semin Reprod Med; 2014 Mar; 32(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 24515908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of Day 5 KIDScore™ morphokinetic prediction models of implantation and live birth after single blastocyst transfer.
    Reignier A; Girard JM; Lammers J; Chtourou S; Lefebvre T; Barriere P; Freour T
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Nov; 36(11):2279-2285. PubMed ID: 31444634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of morphokinetics and morphological dynamics of cleavage stage on embryo developmental potential: A time-lapse study.
    Yang SH; Wu CH; Chen YC; Yang CK; Wu TH; Chen PC; Tsai HD
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 57(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 29458909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth?
    Barberet J; Bruno C; Valot E; Antunes-Nunes C; Jonval L; Chammas J; Choux C; Ginod P; Sagot P; Soudry-Faure A; Fauque P
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1439-1449. PubMed ID: 31287145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system.
    Motato Y; de los Santos MJ; Escriba MJ; Ruiz BA; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):376-84.e9. PubMed ID: 26598211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.
    Rocafort E; Enciso M; Leza A; Sarasa J; Aizpurua J
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Sep; 35(9):1573-1583. PubMed ID: 30030710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-invasive mitochondrial DNA quantification on Day 3 predicts blastocyst development: a prospective, blinded, multi-centric study.
    Stigliani S; Orlando G; Massarotti C; Casciano I; Bovis F; Anserini P; Ubaldi FM; Remorgida V; Rienzi L; Scaruffi P
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 25(9):527-537. PubMed ID: 31174207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should we freeze it? Agreement on fate of borderline blastocysts is poor and does not improve with a modified blastocyst grading system.
    Hammond ER; Foong AKM; Rosli N; Morbeck DE
    Hum Reprod; 2020 May; 35(5):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 32358601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts.
    Tiegs AW; Sun L; Patounakis G; Scott RT
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 31402381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-automated time-lapse analysis results correlate with embryo implantation and clinical pregnancy: a blinded, multi-centre study.
    VerMilyea MD; Tan L; Anthony JT; Conaghan J; Ivani K; Gvakharia M; Boostanfar R; Baker VL; Suraj V; Chen AA; Mainigi M; Coutifaris C; Shen S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Dec; 29(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 25444507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.