These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25331427)

  • 21. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
    Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation.
    Aparicio-Ruiz B; Basile N; Pérez Albalá S; Bronet F; Remohí J; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1379-1385.e10. PubMed ID: 27530063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of a new clinically applicable device for embryo evaluation which measures embryo oxygen consumption.
    Kurosawa H; Utsunomiya H; Shiga N; Takahashi A; Ihara M; Ishibashi M; Nishimoto M; Watanabe Z; Abe H; Kumagai J; Terada Y; Igarashi H; Takahashi T; Fukui A; Suganuma R; Tachibana M; Yaegashi N
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 27609982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
    Yang L; Cai S; Zhang S; Kong X; Gu Y; Lu C; Dai J; Gong F; Lu G; Lin G
    Hum Reprod; 2018 May; 33(5):869-876. PubMed ID: 29546361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Relationship between Cell Number, Division Behavior and Developmental Potential of Cleavage Stage Human Embryos: A Time-Lapse Study.
    Kong X; Yang S; Gong F; Lu C; Zhang S; Lu G; Lin G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153697. PubMed ID: 27077739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?
    Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee JA; Slifkin R; Sandler B; Copperman AB; Flisser E
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 31398251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Non-invasive embryo evaluation and selection using time-lapse monitoring: Results of a randomized controlled study.
    Kovacs P; Matyas S; Forgacs V; Sajgo A; Molnar L; Pribenszky C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():58-63. PubMed ID: 30580224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review.
    Kaser DJ; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(5):617-31. PubMed ID: 24890606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Time-lapse imaging algorithms rank human preimplantation embryos according to the probability of live birth.
    Fishel S; Campbell A; Montgomery S; Smith R; Nice L; Duffy S; Jenner L; Berrisford K; Kellam L; Smith R; Foad F; Beccles A
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 Sep; 37(3):304-313. PubMed ID: 30314885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy?
    Zaninovic N; Irani M; Meseguer M
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):722-729. PubMed ID: 29101997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A predictive model for blastocyst formation based on morphokinetic parameters in time-lapse monitoring of embryo development.
    Milewski R; Kuć P; Kuczyńska A; Stankiewicz B; Łukaszuk K; Kuczyński W
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Apr; 32(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 25690157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mitochondrial DNA quantification as a tool for embryo viability assessment: retrospective analysis of data from single euploid blastocyst transfers.
    Ravichandran K; McCaffrey C; Grifo J; Morales A; Perloe M; Munne S; Wells D; Fragouli E
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1282-1292. PubMed ID: 28387858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Time-lapse algorithms and morphological selection of day-5 embryos for transfer: a preclinical validation study.
    Storr A; Venetis C; Cooke S; Kilani S; Ledger W
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):276-283.e3. PubMed ID: 29331237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A pilot randomized controlled trial of Day 3 single embryo transfer with adjunctive time-lapse selection versus Day 5 single embryo transfer with or without adjunctive time-lapse selection.
    Kaser DJ; Bormann CL; Missmer SA; Farland LV; Ginsburg ES; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1598-1603. PubMed ID: 28854588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Focus on time-lapse analysis: blastocyst collapse and morphometric assessment as new features of embryo viability.
    Sciorio R; Meseguer M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Nov; 43(5):821-832. PubMed ID: 34593324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Morphology vs morphokinetics: a retrospective comparison of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists on blastocysts with known implantation outcome.
    Adolfsson E; Andershed AN
    JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Sep; 22(3):228-237. PubMed ID: 29912521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of a deep learning based neural network in the selection of human blastocysts for implantation.
    Bormann CL; Kanakasabapathy MK; Thirumalaraju P; Gupta R; Pooniwala R; Kandula H; Hariton E; Souter I; Dimitriadis I; Ramirez LB; Curchoe CL; Swain J; Boehnlein LM; Shafiee H
    Elife; 2020 Sep; 9():. PubMed ID: 32930094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.
    Barash OO; Ivani KA; Willman SP; Rosenbluth EM; Wachs DS; Hinckley MD; Pittenger Reid S; Weckstein LN
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Aug; 34(8):1007-1016. PubMed ID: 28560610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application.
    Chen AA; Tan L; Suraj V; Reijo Pera R; Shen S
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(4):1035-43. PubMed ID: 23499001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations.
    Sundvall L; Ingerslev HJ; Breth Knudsen U; Kirkegaard K
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3215-21. PubMed ID: 24070998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.