These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 253319)

  • 21. Jam tomorrow, but not today: why nurses have been conned again.
    Pavitt L
    Nurs Mirror; 1985 Jun; 160(25):9. PubMed ID: 3847977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The comparability report: where Clegg falls so short.
    Nurs Mirror; 1980 Jan; 150(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 6899289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Finnin and Robinson testify on comparable worth bill.
    Finnin M; Robinson B
    Mass Nurse; 1983 Apr; 52(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 6551627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A measure of responsibility.
    McGrath S
    Nurs Mirror; 1985 Aug; 161(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 3849002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. After Clegg--what next for nurses.
    Carr A
    Nurs Focus; 1980 Mar; 1(7):271-2. PubMed ID: 6898994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nurses' pay: striking the right balance on nurses' pay.
    Vaughan G
    Nurs Mirror; 1982 Jan; 154(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 6915534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Your pay in their hands.
    Chudley P
    Nurs Times; 1988 Oct 12-18; 84(41):19. PubMed ID: 3194302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Your right to pay equity as a registered nurse.
    Slisarenko D
    Can Crit Care Nurs J; 1991; 8(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 1954551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The comparability report: where Clegg falls so short.
    Bloor J; Campbell C
    Nurs Mirror; 1980 Jan; 150(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 6898149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nurses are worth even more. What a disappointment! The three words that sum up stormy reaction to Clegg's 19.6% pay offer.
    Brown A; Shevas A; Morris P
    Nurs Mirror; 1980 Jan; 150(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 6899280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nurses need state's tender loving care at budget time.
    Cotterell B
    Fla Nurse; 1989 Mar; 37(3):10. PubMed ID: 2767273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Royal College of Nursing. Double triumph.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1987 Apr; (494):4. PubMed ID: 3648490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Royal College of Nursing: new approach.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Jun; (352):4. PubMed ID: 6564373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Self restraint brings an advantage.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 May; (347):4. PubMed ID: 6563417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Members vote for peace and pay review promise.
    Chudley P
    RCN Nurs Stand; 1982 Dec; (276):1, 8. PubMed ID: 6984527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Regional pay: the nursing organisations' viewpoint.
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Jan; 3(18):12-3. PubMed ID: 2494513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidence to the Review Body.
    Clay T
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Dec; (377):suppl 1. PubMed ID: 6569339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Employment Contracts Bill.
    N Z Nurs J; 1991 Feb; 84(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 1997916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Royal College of Nursing: never the same; fees system.
    Nurs Stand (1984); 1984 Aug; (358):4. PubMed ID: 6565992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reasons for rocking the boat.
    Bolger T; Fogg D
    Nurs Times; 1979 Jul; 75(26):1122-3. PubMed ID: 257416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.