225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25332169)
1. A comparison of the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) by number of stimulation sessions on hemispatial neglect in chronic stroke patients.
Kim YK; Jung JH; Shin SH
Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jan; 233(1):283-9. PubMed ID: 25332169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to hemispatial neglect in patients after stroke: an open-label pilot study.
Lim JY; Kang EK; Paik NJ
J Rehabil Med; 2010 May; 42(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 20544155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeated sessions of functional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases motor cortex excitability and motor control in survivors of stroke.
Massie CL; Tracy BL; Paxton RJ; Malcolm MP
NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23949057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visuospatial neglect in patients with acute stroke: a double-blind, sham-controlled trial.
Kim BR; Chun MH; Kim DY; Lee SJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 May; 94(5):803-7. PubMed ID: 23298790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential effect of conditioning sequences in coupling inhibitory/facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke motor recovery.
Wang CP; Tsai PY; Yang TF; Yang KY; Wang CC
CNS Neurosci Ther; 2014 Apr; 20(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 24422912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Improves Hemispatial Neglect After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Salazar APS; Vaz PG; Marchese RR; Stein C; Pinto C; Pagnussat AS
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 99(2):355-366.e1. PubMed ID: 28802812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of different stimulation parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients.
Yang W; Liu TT; Song XB; Zhang Y; Li ZH; Cui ZH; Hao Q; Liu HL; Lei CL; Liu J
J Neurol Sci; 2015 Dec; 359(1-2):219-25. PubMed ID: 26671118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of coupling intermittent theta-burst stimulation and 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance upper limb motor recovery in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Meng Y; Zhang D; Hai H; Zhao YY; Ma YW
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2020; 38(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 32039879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aftereffects of 2 noninvasive brain stimulation techniques on corticospinal excitability in persons with chronic stroke: a pilot study.
Goh HT; Chan HY; Abdul-Latif L
J Neurol Phys Ther; 2015 Jan; 39(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25427033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the unaffected posterior parietal cortex in patients with unilateral spatial neglect.
Shindo K; Sugiyama K; Huabao L; Nishijima K; Kondo T; Izumi S
J Rehabil Med; 2006 Jan; 38(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 16548090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with sensory cueing on unilateral neglect in subacute patients with right hemispheric stroke: a randomized controlled study.
Yang NY; Fong KN; Li-Tsang CW; Zhou D
Clin Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 31(9):1154-1163. PubMed ID: 27920261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex in cortical and subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke.
Ameli M; Grefkes C; Kemper F; Riegg FP; Rehme AK; Karbe H; Fink GR; Nowak DA
Ann Neurol; 2009 Sep; 66(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19798637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation for visual spatial neglect: a pilot study.
Song W; Du B; Xu Q; Hu J; Wang M; Luo Y
J Rehabil Med; 2009 Feb; 41(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 19229449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function in patients with stroke.
Kwon TG; Park E; Kang C; Chang WH; Kim YH
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 34(6):915-923. PubMed ID: 27689549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noninvasive brain stimulation in rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect after stroke.
Veldema J; Bösl K; Neumann G; Verheyden G; Nowak DA
CNS Spectr; 2020 Feb; 25(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 31046862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of coupling inhibitory and facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in patients following acute cerebral infarction.
Chen Q; Shen D; Sun H; Ke J; Wang H; Pan S; Liu H; Wang D; Su M; Fang Q
NeuroRehabilitation; 2021; 48(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 33361618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement of dexterity by single session low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in acute stroke: a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial.
Liepert J; Zittel S; Weiller C
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(5-6):461-5. PubMed ID: 18334764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissociation of neglect subtypes with transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Ghacibeh GA; Shenker JI; Winter KH; Triggs WJ; Heilman KM
Neurology; 2007 Sep; 69(11):1122-7. PubMed ID: 17846411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects and safety of combined rTMS and action observation for recovery of function in the upper extremities in stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Noh JS; Lim JH; Choi TW; Jang SG; Pyun SB
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2019; 37(3):219-230. PubMed ID: 31177248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hyperexcitability of parietal-motor functional connections in the intact left-hemisphere of patients with neglect.
Koch G; Oliveri M; Cheeran B; Ruge D; Lo Gerfo E; Salerno S; Torriero S; Marconi B; Mori F; Driver J; Rothwell JC; Caltagirone C
Brain; 2008 Dec; 131(Pt 12):3147-55. PubMed ID: 18948300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
