These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Nonparametric comparison of entire ROC curves for computerized ECG left ventricular hypertrophy algorithms using data from the Framingham Heart Study. Campbell G; Levy D; Lausier A; Horton MR; Bailey JJ J Electrocardiol; 1989; 22 Suppl():152-7. PubMed ID: 2533234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpretation of short ECGs with a personal computer: the Porto program. Abreu-Lima C; de Sá JP Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):410-2. PubMed ID: 2233389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new 12-lead pediatric ECG interpretation program. Macfarlane PW; Coleman EN; Devine B; Houston A; McLaughlin S; Aitchison TC; Pomphrey EO J Electrocardiol; 1990; 23 Suppl():76-81. PubMed ID: 2151043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The dilemma of sensitivity versus specificity in computer-interpreted acute myocardial infarction. Elko PP; Weaver WD; Kudenchuk P; Rowlandson I J Electrocardiol; 1992; 24 Suppl():2-7. PubMed ID: 1552258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cohen's kappa or McNemar's test? A comparison of binary repeated measurements]. Krummenauer F; Kalden P; Kreitner KF Rofo; 1999 Sep; 171(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 10520333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?]. Morisbak B; Gjesdal K Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improvement of automated electrocardiographic diagnosis by combination of computer interpretations of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram. Kors JA; van Herpen G; Willems JL; van Bemmel JH Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 70(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 1615877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodology of ECG interpretation in the Louvain program. Brohet CR; Derwael C; Robert A; Fesler R Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 2233388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of the computer-reported vectorcardiogram on the cardiologist interpreter of the scalar electrocardiogram. Milliken JA; Burggraf GW; McCans JL J Electrocardiol; 1977; 10(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 144173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The application of mathematical morphology in ECG signal processing]. Chen YL; Duan HL Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 30(6):434-6. PubMed ID: 17300013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of the IBM (12-lead) and Royal Infirmary (orthogonal three-lead) ECG computer programs. Macfarlane PW; Melville DI; Horton MR; Bailey JJ Circulation; 1981 Feb; 63(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 6450002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A comparative investigation of the clinical value of an ECG-computer analysis (author's transl)]. Enenkel W; Spiel R; Kiss E Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1974 Oct; 86(18):523-7. PubMed ID: 4277767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Multigroup diagnosis of body surface potential maps. Kornreich F; Montague TJ; Rautaharju PM; Kavadias M; Horacek MB; Taccardi B J Electrocardiol; 1989; 22 Suppl():169-78. PubMed ID: 2533236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. XYZ data interpreted by a 12-lead computer program using the derived electrocardiogram. Dower GE; Machado HB J Electrocardiol; 1979 Jul; 12(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 89179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]