145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25333115)
21. Phase-space evolution of x-ray coherence in phase-sensitive imaging.
Wu X; Liu H
Appl Opt; 2008 Aug; 47(22):E44-52. PubMed ID: 18670541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. X-ray scattering in full-field digital mammography.
Nykänen K; Siltanen S
Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1864-73. PubMed ID: 12906205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu T; Moore RH; Rafferty EA; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2636-47. PubMed ID: 15487747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform.
Eltoukhy MM; Faye I; Samir BB
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 20004076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Improved visualization of breast cancer features in multifocal carcinoma using phase-contrast and dark-field mammography: an ex vivo study.
Grandl S; Scherer K; Sztrókay-Gaul A; Birnbacher L; Willer K; Chabior M; Herzen J; Mayr D; Auweter SD; Pfeiffer F; Bamberg F; Hellerhoff K
Eur Radiol; 2015 Dec; 25(12):3659-68. PubMed ID: 25956934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An algebraic iterative reconstruction technique for differential X-ray phase-contrast computed tomography.
Fu J; Schleede S; Tan R; Chen L; Bech M; Achterhold K; Gifford M; Loewen R; Ruth R; Pfeiffer F
Z Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 23(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 23199611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Increasing the darkfield contrast-to-noise ratio using a deconvolution-based information retrieval algorithm in X-ray grating-based phase-contrast imaging.
Weber T; Pelzer G; Bayer F; Horn F; Rieger J; Ritter A; Zang A; Durst J; Anton G; Michel T
Opt Express; 2013 Jul; 21(15):18011-20. PubMed ID: 23938672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. X-ray phase-contrast tomosynthesis for improved breast tissue discrimination.
Schleede S; Bech M; Grandl S; Sztrókay A; Herzen J; Mayr D; Stockmar M; Potdevin G; Zanette I; Rack A; Weitkamp T; Pfeiffer F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 24387825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of edge effect due to phase contrast imaging for mammography.
Matsuo S; Katafuchi T; Tohyama K; Morishita J; Yamada K; Fujita H
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2690-7. PubMed ID: 16193800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A semianalytic model to extract differential linear scattering coefficients of breast tissue from energy dispersive x-ray diffraction measurements.
LeClair RJ; Boileau MM; Wang Y
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):959-67. PubMed ID: 16696472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Noise in x-ray grating-based phase-contrast imaging.
Weber T; Bartl P; Bayer F; Durst J; Haas W; Michel T; Ritter A; Anton G
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4133-40. PubMed ID: 21859014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An iterative three-dimensional electron density imaging algorithm using uncollimated compton scattered x rays from a polyenergetic primary pencil beam.
Van Uytven E; Pistorius S; Gordon R
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):256-65. PubMed ID: 17278511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiologist evaluation of an X-ray tube-based diffraction-enhanced imaging prototype using full-thickness breast specimens.
Faulconer L; Parham C; Connor DM; Zhong Z; Kim E; Zeng D; Livasy C; Cole E; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D; Pisano E
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1329-37. PubMed ID: 19596593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Incomplete skin representation in digital mammograms.
Burgess AE; Kang H
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2834-8. PubMed ID: 15543791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Digital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging?
Alakhras M; Bourne R; Rickard M; Ng KH; Pietrzyk M; Brennan PC
Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):e225-36. PubMed ID: 23465326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A minimum spanning forest based classification method for dedicated breast CT images.
Pike R; Sechopoulos I; Fei B
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6190-202. PubMed ID: 26520712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. On a dark-field signal generated by micrometer-sized calcifications in phase-contrast mammography.
Michel T; Rieger J; Anton G; Bayer F; Beckmann MW; Durst J; Fasching PA; Haas W; Hartmann A; Pelzer G; Radicke M; Rauh C; Ritter A; Sievers P; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Wachter DL; Weber T; Wenkel E; Zang A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(8):2713-32. PubMed ID: 23552903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
