322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25333307)
1. Introduction of an automated user-independent quantitative volumetric magnetic resonance imaging breast density measurement system using the Dixon sequence: comparison with mammographic breast density assessment.
Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Vogl WD; Baltzer P; Langs G; Weber M; Bogner W; Gruber S; Trattnig S; Pinker K
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25333307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 3-point Dixon imaging and fuzzy C-means clustering methods for breast density measurement.
Clendenen TV; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A; Moy L; Pike MC; Rusinek H; Kim S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 23292922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of fat-water separation and spatial resolution on automated volumetric MRI measurements of fibroglandular breast tissue.
Wengert GJ; Pinker-Domenig K; Helbich TH; Vogl WD; Clauser P; Bickel H; Marino MA; Magometschnigg HF; Baltzer PA
NMR Biomed; 2016 Jun; 29(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 27061174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast Density Analysis with Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound: Comparison with 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen JH; Lee YW; Chan SW; Yeh DC; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1211-20. PubMed ID: 26831342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fully Automated Quantitative Estimation of Volumetric Breast Density from Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images: Preliminary Results and Comparison with Digital Mammography and MR Imaging.
Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Kontos D
Radiology; 2016 Apr; 279(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 26491909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does MRI breast "density" (degree of background enhancement) correlate with mammographic breast density?
Hansen NL; Kuhl CK; Barabasch A; Strobel K; Schrading S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Aug; 40(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 24446230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST (CDT)-volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE): a new technique for fast time-resolved dynamic 3-dimensional imaging of the abdomen with high spatial resolution.
Michaely HJ; Morelli JN; Budjan J; Riffel P; Nickel D; Kroeker R; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):590-7. PubMed ID: 23538886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging for secondary assessment of breast density in a high-risk cohort.
Klifa C; Carballido-Gamio J; Wilmes L; Laprie A; Shepherd J; Gibbs J; Fan B; Noworolski S; Hylton N
Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 28(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19631485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression.
Le Y; Kroeker R; Kipfer HD; Lin C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Aug; 36(2):483-91. PubMed ID: 22544731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative MR-guided wire localization for suspicious breast lesions: comparison of manual and automated software calculated targeting.
Kinner S; Herbrik M; Maderwald S; Umutlu L; Nassenstein K
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e80-3. PubMed ID: 24332353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility and repeatability of volumetric measurements for olfactory bulb volumetry: which method is appropriate? An update using 3 Tesla MRI.
Burmeister HP; Baltzer PA; Möslein C; Bitter T; Gudziol H; Dietzel M; Guntinas-Lichius O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jul; 18(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21669350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated chest wall line detection for whole-breast segmentation in sagittal breast MR images.
Wu S; Weinstein SP; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):042301. PubMed ID: 23556914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Solid pancreatic lesions: characterization by using timing bolus dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging assessment--a preliminary study.
Kim JH; Lee JM; Park JH; Kim SC; Joo I; Han JK; Choi BI
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):185-96. PubMed ID: 23192779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pilot study of quantitative analysis of background enhancement on breast MR images: association with menstrual cycle and mammographic breast density.
Scaranelo AM; Carrillo MC; Fleming R; Jacks LM; Kulkarni SR; Crystal P
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):692-700. PubMed ID: 23418005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informatics in Radiology: GUIBOLD: a graphical user interface for image reconstruction and data analysis in susceptibility-weighted MR imaging.
Deistung A; Rauscher A; Sedlacik J; Witoszynskyj S; Reichenbach JR
Radiographics; 2008; 28(3):639-51. PubMed ID: 18480476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Co-registration of MR-mammography and X-ray mammography.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Hopp T; Ruiter NV; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 23083591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
