278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25333308)
1. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for the differentiation of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Bogner W; Spick C; Bagó-Horváth Z; Weber M; Helbich T; Baltzer P
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 25333308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient to Predict Grade, Microinvasion, and Invasion in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.
Hussein H; Chung C; Moshonov H; Miller N; Kulkarni SR; Scaranelo AM
Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1483-8. PubMed ID: 26391856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of invasive components in cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy by using apparent diffusion coefficient MR parameters.
Mori N; Ota H; Mugikura S; Takasawa C; Tominaga J; Ishida T; Watanabe M; Takase K; Takahashi S
Eur Radiol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):2705-12. PubMed ID: 23732688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values.
Peters NH; Vincken KL; van den Bosch MA; Luijten PR; Mali WP; Bartels LW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1100-5. PubMed ID: 20432344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ using whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Kim JY; Kim JJ; Lee JW; Lee NK; Lee G; Kang T; Park H; Son YH; Grimm R
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):485-493. PubMed ID: 30073498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Çabuk G; Nass Duce M; Özgür A; Apaydın FD; Polat A; Orekici G
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25564776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast lesion characterization using whole-lesion histogram analysis with stretched-exponential diffusion model.
Liu C; Wang K; Li X; Zhang J; Ding J; Spuhler K; Duong T; Liang C; Huang C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 47(6):1701-1710. PubMed ID: 29165847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T in urinary bladder lesions: correlation with pathologic findings.
Suo ST; Chen XX; Fan Y; Wu LM; Yao QY; Cao MQ; Liu Q; Xu JR
Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):1027-34. PubMed ID: 24833566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study.
Iima M; Le Bihan D; Okumura R; Okada T; Fujimoto K; Kanao S; Tanaka S; Fujimoto M; Sakashita H; Togashi K
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 21633054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Lee CW; Wu HK; Lai HW; Wu WP; Chen ST; Chen DR; Chen CJ; Kuo SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):780-9. PubMed ID: 26971424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histogram analysis of volume-based apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer.
Park GE; Kim SH; Kim EJ; Kang BJ; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2017 Nov; 58(11):1294-1302. PubMed ID: 28273747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion-weighted imaging (b value = 1500 s/mm(2)) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changes.
Ochi M; Kuroiwa T; Sunami S; Murakami J; Miyahara S; Nagaie T; Oya M; Yabuuchi H; Hatakenaka M
Breast Cancer; 2013 Apr; 20(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 22161277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 21182127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness.
Cao K; Gao M; Sun YS; Li YL; Sun Y; Gao YN; Zhang XP
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1926-30. PubMed ID: 21592709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma
Zhao S; Shao G; Chen P; Li L; Yang Y; Zhao X; Guo W
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(4):871-875. PubMed ID: 31436245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive enhancement integral values in dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of breast carcinoma: ductal carcinoma in situ vs. invasive ductal carcinoma.
Nadrljanski M; Maksimović R; Plešinac-Karapandžić V; Nikitović M; Marković-Vasiljković B; Milošević Z
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1363-7. PubMed ID: 24894697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative evaluation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures with diffusion-weighted MRI: what is the optimum combination of b values for ADC-based lesion differentiation with the single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence?
Geith T; Schmidt G; Biffar A; Dietrich O; Duerr HR; Reiser M; Baur-Melnyk A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):582-8. PubMed ID: 25148160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings.
Woodhams R; Kakita S; Hata H; Iwabuchi K; Umeoka S; Mountford CE; Hatabu H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):260-6. PubMed ID: 19542422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
