These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25333619)

  • 1. Incentivizing the public to support invasive species management: eurasian milfoil reduces lakefront property values.
    Olden JD; Tamayo M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110458. PubMed ID: 25333619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A machine-learning approach to predict success of a biocontrol for invasive Eurasian watermilfoil reduction.
    White DT; Antoniou TM; Martin JM; Kmetz W; Twiss MR
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Sep; 32(6):e2625. PubMed ID: 35397182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hedonic analysis of effects of a nonnative invader (Myriophyllum heterophyllum) on New Hampshire (USA) lakefront properties.
    Halstead JM; Michaud J; Hallas-Burt S; Gibbs JP
    Environ Manage; 2003 Sep; 32(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 14753624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct Comparison of Herbicidal or Biological Treatment on
    Marko MD; White JC
    Front Plant Sci; 2018; 9():1814. PubMed ID: 30619395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limitations of gravity models in predicting the spread of Eurasian watermilfoil.
    Rothlisberger JD; Lodge DM
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 20964712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation in hostplant preference and performance by the milfoil weevil, Euhrychiopsis lecontei Dietz, exposed to native and exotic watermilfoils.
    Solarz SL; Newman RM
    Oecologia; 2001 Jan; 126(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 28547439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Invasive species triggers a massive loss of ecosystem services through a trophic cascade.
    Walsh JR; Carpenter SR; Vander Zanden MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Apr; 113(15):4081-5. PubMed ID: 27001838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the economic value of cultural ecosystem services in an urbanizing area using hedonic pricing.
    Sander HA; Haight RG
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 113():194-205. PubMed ID: 23025985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Colonization of a Submersed Aquatic Plant, Eurasian Water Milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum), by Fungi under Controlled Conditions.
    Smith CS; Chand T; Harris RF; Andrews JH
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1989 Sep; 55(9):2326-32. PubMed ID: 16348013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using economic instruments to develop effective management of invasive species: insights from a bioeconomic model.
    McDermott SM; Irwin RE; Taylor BW
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1086-100. PubMed ID: 23967577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impacts of environmental disturbances on housing prices: A review of the hedonic pricing literature.
    Nicholls S
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():1-10. PubMed ID: 31170618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applying multi-criteria analysis for preliminary assessment of the properties of alginate immobilized Myriophyllum spicatum in lake water samples.
    Milojković JV; Popović-Djordjević JB; Pezo LL; Brčeski ID; Kostić AŽ; Milošević VD; Stojanović MD
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 141():163-171. PubMed ID: 29783169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AIS explorer: Prioritization for watercraft inspections-A decision-support tool for aquatic invasive species management.
    Kinsley AC; Haight RG; Snellgrove N; Muellner P; Muellner U; Duhr M; Phelps NBD
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 314():115037. PubMed ID: 35462252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Public lakes, private lakeshore: modeling protection of native aquatic plants.
    Schroeder SA; Fulton DC
    Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 52(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 23609308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applying best-worst scaling to rank ecosystem and economic benefits of restoration and conservation in the Great Lakes.
    Tyner EH; Boyer TA
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 255():109888. PubMed ID: 31790870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A bi-level model for state and county aquatic invasive species prevention decisions.
    Haight RG; Yemshanov D; Kao SY; Phelps NBD; Kinsley AC
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 327():116855. PubMed ID: 36462487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aquatic nuisance species in the New York State Canal and Hudson River systems and the Great Lakes Basin: an economic and environmental assessment.
    Pimentel D
    Environ Manage; 2005 May; 35(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 15920670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monitoring Re-Growth of Invasive Plants Using an Autonomous Surface Vessel.
    Codd-Downey R; Jenkin M; Dey BB; Zacher J; Blainey E; Andrews P
    Front Robot AI; 2020; 7():583416. PubMed ID: 33553245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explaining human settlement patterns in a recreational lake district: Vilas County, Wisconsin, USA.
    Schnaiberg J; Riera J; Turner MG; Voss PR
    Environ Manage; 2002 Jul; 30(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 12053237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic impacts of invasive species in forests: past, present, and future.
    Holmes TP; Aukema JE; Von Holle B; Liebhold A; Sills E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():18-38. PubMed ID: 19432643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.