These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2533587)
1. Ethical considerations in the life of a child with Down syndrome. Pueschel SM Issues Law Med; 1989; 5(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 2533587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The legislative response to Infant Doe. Kuzma AL Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Getting down to cases. Scofield GR Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):213-26. PubMed ID: 1938336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Meningomyelocele in the neonate: medical and ethical considerations. Steinberg A J Perinatol; 1991 Mar; 11(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2037891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The aftermath of the Cruzan decision: dying in a twilight zone. Aroskar MA Nurs Outlook; 1990; 38(6):256-7. PubMed ID: 2235533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Do the "Baby Doe" rules ignore suffering? Kopelman LM Second Opin; 1993 Apr; 18(4):101-13. PubMed ID: 10125415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An approach to Down syndrome in light of Infant Doe. Elkins TE; Brown D Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):419-40. PubMed ID: 2941389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Of diagnoses and discrimination: discriminatory nontreatment of infants with HIV infection. Crossley MA Columbia Law Rev; 1993 Nov; 93(7):1581-667. PubMed ID: 11659791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The legacy of Infant Doe. Cosby MG Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The law and intensive care. The role of the courts in the ethical decision-making process. Smith DA Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 3454239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human rights and the omission or cessation of treatment for infants. Goldworth A J Perinatol; 1989 Mar; 9(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 2709156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In re K.I.: an urgent need for a uniform system in the treatment of the critically ill infant--recognizing the sanctity of life of the child. Guevara AL Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 2001; 36(1):237-60. PubMed ID: 16523587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey. Sarno JJ Seton Hall Legis J; 1987; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law. Bopp J; Avila D Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical dilemmas in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Brooks BF J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985; 1(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 10280374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Baby Doe'--a medical ethical issue. Lang GC West J Med; 1985 Jun; 142(6):837-41. PubMed ID: 4024642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Putting hospitals on notice. Fost N Hastings Cent Rep; 1982 Aug; 12(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 6215343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decision-making and the right to refuse lifesaving treatment for defective newborns. Shatten DA; Chabon RS J Leg Med; 1982 Mar; 3(1):59-79. PubMed ID: 6979600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates. Gostin L Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Cruzan decision: an ethical perspective. Drane JF Pa Med; 1990 Dec; 93(12):24-7. PubMed ID: 2274332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]