These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25336050)

  • 1. Assessment of body-powered upper limb prostheses by able-bodied subjects, using the Box and Blocks Test and the Nine-Hole Peg Test.
    Haverkate L; Smit G; Plettenburg DH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 25336050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficiency of voluntary closing hand and hook prostheses.
    Smit G; Plettenburg DH
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Dec; 34(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 20849359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development?
    Smit G; Bongers RM; Van der Sluis CK; Plettenburg DH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 22773256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of transradial body-powered prostheses using a robotic simulator.
    Ayub R; Villarreal D; Gregg RD; Gao F
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 27469105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of voluntary opening Ottobock Hook and Hosmer Hook for upper limb prosthetics: a preliminary study.
    Hashim NA; Abd Razak NAB; Gholizadeh H; Osman NAA
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Aug; 62(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 27865091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning to use a body-powered prosthesis: changes in functionality and kinematics.
    Huinink LH; Bouwsema H; Plettenburg DH; van der Sluis CK; Bongers RM
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Oct; 13(1):90. PubMed ID: 27716254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kinematic analysis of motor learning in upper limb body-powered bypass prosthesis training.
    Bloomer C; Wang S; Kontson K
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226563. PubMed ID: 31978051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of a passive capstan based grasp enhancement feature in a voluntary-closing prosthetic terminal device.
    Gemmell KD; Leddy MT; Belter JT; Dollar AM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5019-5025. PubMed ID: 28269396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and evaluation of voluntary opening and voluntary closing prosthetic terminal device.
    Sensinger JW; Lipsey J; Thomas A; Turner K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 26186081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is body powered operation of upper limb prostheses feasible for young limb deficient children?
    Shaperman J; Leblanc M; Setoguchi Y; McNeal DR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1995 Dec; 19(3):165-75. PubMed ID: 8927528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An experimental apparatus to simulate body-powered prosthetic usage: Development and preliminary evaluation.
    Gao F; Rodriguez J; Kapp S
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 25820641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High Cable Forces Deteriorate Pinch Force Control in Voluntary-Closing Body-Powered Prostheses.
    Hichert M; Abbink DA; Kyberd PJ; Plettenburg DH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169996. PubMed ID: 28099454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grasp and force based taxonomy of split-hook prosthetic terminal devices.
    Belter JT; Reynolds BC; Dollar AM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():6613-8. PubMed ID: 25571512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Refined clothespin relocation test and assessment of motion.
    Hussaini A; Kyberd P
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 27473641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of order of practice in learning to handle an upper-limb prosthesis.
    Bouwsema H; van der Sluis CK; Bongers RM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Sep; 89(9):1759-64. PubMed ID: 18675393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of command algorithms for control of upper-extremity neural prostheses.
    Humbert SD; Snyder SA; Grill WM
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2002 Jun; 10(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 12236452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design and Fabrication of a Six Degree-of-Freedom Open Source Hand.
    Krausz NE; Rorrer RA; Weir RF
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 May; 24(5):562-72. PubMed ID: 26087495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of an adjustable electrode housing unit to compare electrode alignment and contact variation with myoelectric prosthesis functionality: A pilot study.
    Head JS; Howard D; Hutchins SW; Kenney L; Heath GH; Aksenov AY
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 25134531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The DEKA hand: A multifunction prosthetic terminal device-patterns of grip usage at home.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Borgia M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Aug; 42(4):446-454. PubMed ID: 28914583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical analysis of users of multi-articulating externally powered prostheses with and without their device.
    Wanamaker AB; Whelan LR; Farley J; Chaudhari AM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Dec; 43(6):618-628. PubMed ID: 31466507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.