BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25336051)

  • 1. Responsiveness of outcome measures for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation.
    Resnik L; Borgia M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):96-108. PubMed ID: 25336051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic Review of Measures of Impairment and Activity Limitation for Persons With Upper Limb Trauma and Amputation.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Silver B; Cancio J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 98(9):1863-1892.e14. PubMed ID: 28209508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Function, quality of life, and community integration of DEKA Arm users after discharge from prosthetic training: Impact of home use experience.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Borgia M; Cancio J; Latlief G; Sasson N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Dec; 42(6):571-582. PubMed ID: 29779455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the QuickDASH in Patients With Upper Limb Amputation.
    Resnik L; Borgia M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Sep; 96(9):1676-83. PubMed ID: 25912667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the University of New Brunswick Test of Prosthetic Function and the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control.
    Burger H; Brezovar D; Vidmar G
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Aug; 50(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 24476807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Latlief G; Klinger SL; Sasson N; Walters LS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):456-66. PubMed ID: 24286806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the UNB test reliable and valid for use with adults with upper limb amputation?
    Resnik L; Baxter K; Borgia M; Mathewson K
    J Hand Ther; 2013; 26(4):353-9; quiz 359. PubMed ID: 24012168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of clinical test and questionnaires for the evaluation of upper limb prosthetic use in children.
    Burger H; Brezovar D; Marincek C
    Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Jul 22-Aug 5; 26(14-15):911-6. PubMed ID: 15497921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting mobility outcome in lower limb amputees with motor ability tests used in early rehabilitation.
    Spaan MH; Vrieling AH; van de Berg P; Dijkstra PU; van Keeken HG
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):171-177. PubMed ID: 27770064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive predictors of skilled performance with an advanced upper limb multifunction prosthesis: a preliminary analysis.
    Hancock L; Correia S; Ahern D; Barredo J; Resnik L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Jul; 12(5):504-511. PubMed ID: 27049235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brief activity performance measure for upper limb amputees: BAM-ULA.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Acluche F
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 28091278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The DEKA hand: A multifunction prosthetic terminal device-patterns of grip usage at home.
    Resnik L; Acluche F; Borgia M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Aug; 42(4):446-454. PubMed ID: 28914583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation.
    Resnik L; Meucci MR; Lieberman-Klinger S; Fantini C; Kelty DL; Disla R; Sasson N
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Apr; 93(4):710-7. PubMed ID: 22464092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appropriateness of advanced upper limb prosthesis prescription for a patient with cognitive impairment: a case report.
    Barredo J; Acluche F; Disla R; Fantini C; Fishelis L; Sasson N; Resnik L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Aug; 12(6):647-656. PubMed ID: 27434169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-reported and performance-based outcomes using DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Latlief G; Sasson N; Smurr-Walters L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 25019659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Function and Quality of Life of Unilateral Major Upper Limb Amputees: Effect of Prosthesis Use and Type.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Clark M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 101(8):1396-1406. PubMed ID: 32437692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Upper Extremity Amputation and Prosthetics Care Across the Active Duty Military and Veteran Populations.
    Cancio JM; Ikeda AJ; Barnicott SL; Childers WL; Alderete JF; Goff BJ
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2019 Feb; 30(1):73-87. PubMed ID: 30470430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the DEKA Arm for amputees with brachial plexus injury: A case series.
    Resnik L; Fantini C; Latlief G; Phillips S; Sasson N; Sepulveda E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178642. PubMed ID: 28628623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feminine identity and functional benefits are key factors in women's decision making about upper limb prostheses: a case series.
    Resnik L; Klinger S; Gill A; Ekerholm Biester S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Feb; 14(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 29741966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The DEKA Arm: its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):492-504. PubMed ID: 24150930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.