202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25336415)
1. Comparison of different incubation conditions for microbiological environmental monitoring.
Gordon O; Berchtold M; Staerk A; Roesti D
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(5):394-406. PubMed ID: 25336415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicenter Study on Incubation Conditions for Environmental Monitoring and Aseptic Process Simulation.
Guinet R; Berthoumieu N; Dutot P; Triquet J; Ratajczak M; Thibaudon M; Bechaud P; Arliaud C; Miclet E; Giordano F; Larcon M; Arthaud C
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2017 1/2; 71(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 27593691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examination of the order of incubation for the recovery of bacteria and fungi from pharmaceutical-grade cleanrooms.
Sandle T
Int J Pharm Compd; 2014; 18(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 25306772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Establishment of a Single Temperature Incubation Approach for Environmental Monitoring Samples with Focus on Mold Recoveries.
Poloni A; GonÇalves J; Pereira M; Stoll A
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2024 Jun; 78(3):312-330. PubMed ID: 37848200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revision of Viable Environmental Monitoring in a Development Pilot Plant Based on Quality Risk Assessment: A Case Study.
Ziegler I; Borbély-Jakab J; Sugó L; Kovács RJ
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2017; 71(3):234-244. PubMed ID: 28089966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Recovery Rate of Different Swabs for Microbial Environmental Monitoring.
Goverde M; Willrodt J; Staerk A
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2017 1/2; 71(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 27516491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality Control Testing for Tracking Endotoxin-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria during the Preparation of Polyvalent Snake Antivenom Immunoglobulin.
Sheraba NS; Diab MR; Yassin AS; Amin MA; Zedan HH
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(4):499-510. PubMed ID: 26242786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of psychrophilic and psychrotolerant micro-organisms isolated in cold rooms used for pharmaceutical processing.
Sandle T; Skinner K
J Appl Microbiol; 2013 Apr; 114(4):1166-74. PubMed ID: 23216715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Charting and Evaluation of Environmental Microbial Monitoring Data.
Bar R
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(6):743-61. PubMed ID: 26659105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Media-fill simulation tests in manual and robotic aseptic preparation of injection solutions in syringes.
Krämer I; Federici M; Kaiser V; Thiesen J
J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Apr; 22(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 25549919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Continuous Microbiological Environmental Monitoring for Process Understanding and Reduced Interventions in Aseptic Manufacturing.
Weber J; Hauschild J; Ijzerman-Boon P; Forng RY; Horsch J; Yan L; Prasad A; Henry RB; Claassen M; Villari P; Shereefa S; Wyatt J; Bolden JS; Pycke JT; Dassu D
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2019; 73(2):121-134. PubMed ID: 30361285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Continuous and Effective Microbiological Air Monitoring in Critical Environments: A Comparison of Analytical Methodologies.
Dalmaso G; Campanella A; Lazzeri P
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(4):446-455. PubMed ID: 32060221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation Study of Rapid Assays of Bioburden, Endotoxins and Other Contamination.
Shintani H
Biocontrol Sci; 2016; 21(2):63-72. PubMed ID: 27350424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of the detection ability of an intrinsic fluorescence-based bioaerosol detection system for heat-stressed bacteria.
Irie K; Scott A; Hasegawa N
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(5):478-93. PubMed ID: 25336419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuous microbiological air monitoring for aseptic filling lines.
Scherwing C; Golin F; Guenec O; Pflanz K; Dalmaso G; Bini M; Andone F
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2007; 61(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 17479718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the BioVigilant IMD-A, a novel optical spectroscopy technology for the continuous and real-time environmental monitoring of viable and nonviable particles. Part II. Case studies in environmental monitoring during aseptic filling, intervention assessments, and glove integrity testing in manufacturing isolators.
Miller MJ; Walsh MR; Shrake JL; Dukes RE; Hill DB
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2009; 63(3):259-83. PubMed ID: 20069799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Continuous microbiological air monitoring for aseptic filling lines.
Ginsbury K
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2007; 61(4):225. PubMed ID: 17933205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Isolation and characterization of the environmental bacterial and fungi contamination in a pharmaceutical unit of mesenchymal stem cell for clinical use.
Martín PG; González MB; Martínez AR; Lara VG; Naveros BC
Biologicals; 2012 Sep; 40(5):330-7. PubMed ID: 22795333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microbiological monitoring of dialysis water systems--which culture method?
Ray J
J Ren Care; 2007; 33(2):66-9. PubMed ID: 17702508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Environmental microbial challenges to an aseptic Blow-Fill-Seal process--a practical study.
Jones DJ; Topping P; Sharp J
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1995; 49(5):226-34. PubMed ID: 7489196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
